Holoparasitus, Witaliński, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4277.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:70C1663B-F33F-42C1-99C9-FC3A0A4110DA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6004373 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F8773-FFB9-FFAF-FF79-5EFF9332788B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Holoparasitus |
status |
|
Key to Holoparasitus species (Males)
1. Sternum with an excipulum (e.g. Figs 229, 230 View FIGURES 228 – 242 ); if excipulum is not encountered, a distinct, not-reticulated elliptic area1 is found on the sternum at the coxae II level ( Fig. 231 View FIGURES 228 – 242 ).......................................................... 2
- Excipulum or its equivalent, a non-reticulated area on the sternum absent (e.g. Fig. 228 View FIGURES 228 – 242 )............................ 15
2. Gnathotectum with the central prong well pronounced, acute, flanked by the two lateral prongs, sometimes minute or altogether absent (e.g. Figs 234, 239 View FIGURES 228 – 242 )......................................................................... 3
- Gnathotectum central prong lobate ( Fig. 235 View FIGURES 228 – 242 ), rounded or obtuse anteriorly, either spineless, or with minute spines (1–3) apically (e.g. Figs 281 View FIGURES 270 – 287 , 310 View FIGURES 302 – 314 ); lateral small prongs present; a mobile digit of chelicera much thicker in the basal half (e.g. Figs 282 View FIGURES 270 – 287 , 288 View FIGURES 288 – 301 , 311 View FIGURES 302 – 314 ) (in H. rotulifer ( Willmann, 1940) gnathotectum with a single central prong only, and a movable digit of chelicera with a tubercle on the external (ventral) margin)..................................... ( calcaratus species-group)...9
3. Postcoxal glands gv2 empty into the cuticular foveolae ( Figs 231 View FIGURES 228 – 242 , 243 View FIGURES 243 – 258 )........................................... 4
- Cuticular foveolae behind coxae IV—not encountered........................................................ 5
4. Sternum with a well-developed excipulum ( Fig. 243 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ); corniculi slightly indented; dorsal edge of fixed digit of chelicera normal ( Fig. 244 View FIGURES 243 – 258 )........................................................... H. dallaii Witaliński, 1994 ( Figs 243–245 View FIGURES 243 – 258 )
1. In H. globosus excipulum is either weakly visible or only not-reticulated area in that place is present - Sternum with a non-reticulated area ( Fig. 231 View FIGURES 228 – 242 ); in some specimens the traces of excipulum can be detected; corniculi not indented; dorsal edge of fixed digit of chelicera with an elevation ( Fig. 246 View FIGURES 243 – 258 )..................................................................................................... H. globosus Witaliński, 1994 ( Figs 231 View FIGURES 228 – 242 , 246, 247 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ) 5. Gnathotectum with all prongs similarly well pronounced ( Fig. 248 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ); Ti II with additional tubercle dorsally ( Fig. 249 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ); fixed digit of chelicera knife-shaped and toothless ( Fig. 250 View FIGURES 243 – 258 )...................... H. cultriger ( Berlese, 1906) ( Figs 248–250 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ) - Gnathotectum with the central prong well pronounced, whereas the lateral ones are either small or altogether absent ( Fig. 251 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ); Ti II with a regular prong only; fixed digit of chelicera either toothless or with several dents.......................... 6 6. Excipulum horseshoe-shaped, its anterior thickened margin complete ( Figs 252 View FIGURES 243 – 258 , 259 View FIGURES 259 – 269 ); sternal reticulation unremarkable; hypostomatic setae not on a separate piece of cuticle ( Fig. 253 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ); fixed digit of chelicera practically toothless............................................................................................ ( peraltus species-group)...7 - Excipulum “open” at both anterior and posterior ends and flanked by two very prominent lines of reticulation running parallel to the excipulum anterolateral margins ( Figs 265 View FIGURES 259 – 269 , 270 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ); hypostomatic setae on a separate piece of cuticle (like in Fig. 232 View FIGURES 228 – 242 ); fixed digit of chelicera with a row of many tiny denticles......................... ( hemisphaericus species-group)...8 7. Spur on Ti II singular, long and low ( Figs 256, 257 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ); pedipalp trochanter with seta v1 simple, v2 stout and terminally brushy, settled on eminence not far from v1 ( Fig. 254 View FIGURES 243 – 258 )............................. H. peraltus ( Berlese, 1906) ( Figs 251–258 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ) - Spur on Ti II bipartite ( Figs 262, 263 View FIGURES 259 – 269 ): proximal part with a sigmoidal edge, distal one forming a tooth-like structure; seta v2 pectinate distally, neither stout nor located on eminence close to v1. ................................................................................................... H. nonaltus Witaliński & Skorupski, 2003a ( Figs 259–264 View FIGURES 259 – 269 ) 8. Spur on Ti II ( Figs 267–269 View FIGURES 259 – 269 ) ending distally at the segment margin and visible as an arcuate tape from both the ventral and the lateral sides; the cuticle located behind the spur (posteriorly) is weakly pigmented ( Figs 268, 269 View FIGURES 259 – 269 )................................................................................. H. rhombogynialis Witaliński, 2006 ( Figs 265–269 View FIGURES 259 – 269 ) - Spur on Ti II ending far behind the distal margin of the segment ( Figs 272, 273 View FIGURES 270 – 287 )................................................................................................ H. hemisphaericus ( Vitzthum, 1923) ( Figs 270–273 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ) 9. Excipulum strong, well pronounced, with the lateral margins partially overlapped by a thin cuticular lamellae (e.g. Figs 274, 280 View FIGURES 270 – 287 )............................................................................................... 10 - Excipulum weakly to moderately pronounced, its lateral margins not overlapped by the cuticular lamellae (e.g. Figs 298 View FIGURES 288 – 301 , 308 View FIGURES 302 – 314 )................................................................................................... 11 10. Gnathotectum central lobe pointed; spurs on Ge II large and high, the ones on Ti II smaller and low ( Fig. 278 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ); very narrow movable digit of chelicera with semicircular tubercle on the external (ventral) edge ( Fig. 276 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ).......................................................................................... H. rotulifer ( Willmann, 1940) ( Figs 274–278 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ) - Gnathotectum central lobe obtuse ( Fig. 281 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ); fixed digit of chelicera with one-fourth to one-third distal part—narrower ( Fig. 282 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ), in dorso-ventral perspective a tubercular to tooth-like protrusion directed laterally at pilus dentilis level is visible ( Fig. 283 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ); movable digit without any tubercle on the external (ventral) edge... H. excipuliger ( Berlese, 1906) ( Figs 229 View FIGURES 228 – 242 , 279–287 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ) 11. The pores of postcoxal glands gv2 surrounded by a thickened cuticle forming foveolae ( Fig. 293 View FIGURES 288 – 301 )..................... 12 - Cuticular foveolae around the gv2 gland pores – absent....................................................... 13 12. Axillary process on Fe II asymmetric and bent towards the segment ( Figs 290, 291 View FIGURES 288 – 301 ); cheliceral fixed digit with a lateral triangular projection ( Fig. 289 View FIGURES 288 – 301 ), seta v2 on pedipalp trochanter pectinate distally on both sides and thicker than v1. ........................................................................ H. pseudoperforatus ( Berlese, 1906) ( Figs 288–292 View FIGURES 288 – 301 ) - Axillary process on Fe II symmetric ( Figs 295, 296 View FIGURES 288 – 301 ); cheliceral fixed digit without a lateral projection ( Fig. 294 View FIGURES 288 – 301 ).......................................................................... H. pollicipatus ( Berlese, 1903) ( Figs 293–297 View FIGURES 288 – 301 ) 13. Spurs on Ge II and Ti II very similar, low and ridgelike ( Figs 300, 301 View FIGURES 288 – 301 )................................................................................................ H. kerkirensis Witaliński & Skorupski, 2002 ( Figs 298–301 View FIGURES 288 – 301 ) - Spurs on Ge II and Ti II different........................................................................ 14 14. Corniculi slender with an adaxial border only slightly sinuous; movable digit of chelicera with one large proximal tooth followed by 4–6 minute distal teeth ( Fig. 302 View FIGURES 302 – 314 ); main spur on the femur with an apical segment blunt terminally and quadrilateral, if observed from a ventral perspective ( Figs 303, 306 View FIGURES 302 – 314 )................... H. calcaratus ( Koch, 1839) ( Figs 230 View FIGURES 228 – 242 , 302–307 View FIGURES 302 – 314 ) - Corniculi with a small protuberance on the adaxial border ( Fig. 309 View FIGURES 302 – 314 ); movable digit of chelicera with one large proximal tooth followed by 2 smaller distal teeth ( Fig. 311 View FIGURES 302 – 314 )............... H. paradisiacus Witaliński & Skorupski, 2003b ( Figs 308–314 View FIGURES 302 – 314 ) 15. Ti II with several spurs, the two ventral ones huge ( Fig. 316 View FIGURES 315 – 320 )......... H. karawankianus ( Schmölzer, 1991) ( Figs 315, 316 View FIGURES 315 – 320 ) - The two huge spurs on Ti II—not encountered.............................................................. 16 16. Hypostomatic setae on a piece of cuticle separated laterally and posteriorly with narrow incisions................... 17 - Incisions in a cuticle laterally to and behind the hypostomatic setae – absent...................................... 46 17. Postcoxal gv2 glands empty into the cuticular foveolae ( Fig. 317 View FIGURES 315 – 320 ).. H. fovealis Witaliński & Skorupski, 2006 ( Figs 317–320 View FIGURES 315 – 320 ) - Cuticular foveolae behind coxae IV – absent............................................................... 18 18. Hypostome with a central part distinctly sclerotised, tongue-like (e.g. Figs 340 View FIGURES 336 – 345 , 391, 398 View FIGURES 391 – 401 ) or extended anteriorly2 ( Fig. 349 View FIGURES 346 – 360 )............................................................................ ( mallorcae species-group) 3...19 - Central part of the hypostome triangular and weakly sclerotised (e.g. Figs 232, 233 View FIGURES 228 – 242 , 451 View FIGURES 443 – 454 , 465 View FIGURES 465 – 475 )........................ 39 19. Glands gv1 absent; genital lamina rounded, heavily sclerotised on the inner face ( Figs 321, 326, 327, 332 View FIGURES 321 – 335 ); microsclerite bearing tritosternum large and trapezoidal..................................................................... 20 - Gland gv1 present; genital lamina of another shape and rather weakly sclerotised, largely transparent (e.g. Figs 373 View FIGURES 361 – 375 , 405, 411 View FIGURES 402 – 413 ); 2. Similar in appearance to those in the Rhabdocarpais males
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SuperOrder |
Parasitiformes |
Order |
|
Family |