Holoparasitus, Witaliński, 2017

Witaliński, Wojciech, 2017, Key to the world species of Holoparasitus Oudemans, 1936 (Acari: Parasitiformes: Parasitidae), Zootaxa 4277 (3), pp. 301-351 : 310

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4277.3.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:70C1663B-F33F-42C1-99C9-FC3A0A4110DA

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6004373

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F8773-FFB9-FFAF-FF79-5EFF9332788B

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Holoparasitus
status

 

Key to Holoparasitus species (Males)

1. Sternum with an excipulum (e.g. Figs 229, 230 View FIGURES 228 – 242 ); if excipulum is not encountered, a distinct, not-reticulated elliptic area1 is found on the sternum at the coxae II level ( Fig. 231 View FIGURES 228 – 242 ).......................................................... 2

- Excipulum or its equivalent, a non-reticulated area on the sternum absent (e.g. Fig. 228 View FIGURES 228 – 242 )............................ 15

2. Gnathotectum with the central prong well pronounced, acute, flanked by the two lateral prongs, sometimes minute or altogether absent (e.g. Figs 234, 239 View FIGURES 228 – 242 )......................................................................... 3

- Gnathotectum central prong lobate ( Fig. 235 View FIGURES 228 – 242 ), rounded or obtuse anteriorly, either spineless, or with minute spines (1–3) apically (e.g. Figs 281 View FIGURES 270 – 287 , 310 View FIGURES 302 – 314 ); lateral small prongs present; a mobile digit of chelicera much thicker in the basal half (e.g. Figs 282 View FIGURES 270 – 287 , 288 View FIGURES 288 – 301 , 311 View FIGURES 302 – 314 ) (in H. rotulifer ( Willmann, 1940) gnathotectum with a single central prong only, and a movable digit of chelicera with a tubercle on the external (ventral) margin)..................................... ( calcaratus species-group)...9

3. Postcoxal glands gv2 empty into the cuticular foveolae ( Figs 231 View FIGURES 228 – 242 , 243 View FIGURES 243 – 258 )........................................... 4

- Cuticular foveolae behind coxae IV—not encountered........................................................ 5

4. Sternum with a well-developed excipulum ( Fig. 243 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ); corniculi slightly indented; dorsal edge of fixed digit of chelicera normal ( Fig. 244 View FIGURES 243 – 258 )........................................................... H. dallaii Witaliński, 1994 ( Figs 243–245 View FIGURES 243 – 258 )

1. In H. globosus excipulum is either weakly visible or only not-reticulated area in that place is present - Sternum with a non-reticulated area ( Fig. 231 View FIGURES 228 – 242 ); in some specimens the traces of excipulum can be detected; corniculi not indented; dorsal edge of fixed digit of chelicera with an elevation ( Fig. 246 View FIGURES 243 – 258 )..................................................................................................... H. globosus Witaliński, 1994 ( Figs 231 View FIGURES 228 – 242 , 246, 247 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ) 5. Gnathotectum with all prongs similarly well pronounced ( Fig. 248 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ); Ti II with additional tubercle dorsally ( Fig. 249 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ); fixed digit of chelicera knife-shaped and toothless ( Fig. 250 View FIGURES 243 – 258 )...................... H. cultriger ( Berlese, 1906) ( Figs 248–250 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ) - Gnathotectum with the central prong well pronounced, whereas the lateral ones are either small or altogether absent ( Fig. 251 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ); Ti II with a regular prong only; fixed digit of chelicera either toothless or with several dents.......................... 6 6. Excipulum horseshoe-shaped, its anterior thickened margin complete ( Figs 252 View FIGURES 243 – 258 , 259 View FIGURES 259 – 269 ); sternal reticulation unremarkable; hypostomatic setae not on a separate piece of cuticle ( Fig. 253 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ); fixed digit of chelicera practically toothless............................................................................................ ( peraltus species-group)...7 - Excipulum “open” at both anterior and posterior ends and flanked by two very prominent lines of reticulation running parallel to the excipulum anterolateral margins ( Figs 265 View FIGURES 259 – 269 , 270 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ); hypostomatic setae on a separate piece of cuticle (like in Fig. 232 View FIGURES 228 – 242 ); fixed digit of chelicera with a row of many tiny denticles......................... ( hemisphaericus species-group)...8 7. Spur on Ti II singular, long and low ( Figs 256, 257 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ); pedipalp trochanter with seta v1 simple, v2 stout and terminally brushy, settled on eminence not far from v1 ( Fig. 254 View FIGURES 243 – 258 )............................. H. peraltus ( Berlese, 1906) ( Figs 251–258 View FIGURES 243 – 258 ) - Spur on Ti II bipartite ( Figs 262, 263 View FIGURES 259 – 269 ): proximal part with a sigmoidal edge, distal one forming a tooth-like structure; seta v2 pectinate distally, neither stout nor located on eminence close to v1. ................................................................................................... H. nonaltus Witaliński & Skorupski, 2003a ( Figs 259–264 View FIGURES 259 – 269 ) 8. Spur on Ti II ( Figs 267–269 View FIGURES 259 – 269 ) ending distally at the segment margin and visible as an arcuate tape from both the ventral and the lateral sides; the cuticle located behind the spur (posteriorly) is weakly pigmented ( Figs 268, 269 View FIGURES 259 – 269 )................................................................................. H. rhombogynialis Witaliński, 2006 ( Figs 265–269 View FIGURES 259 – 269 ) - Spur on Ti II ending far behind the distal margin of the segment ( Figs 272, 273 View FIGURES 270 – 287 )................................................................................................ H. hemisphaericus ( Vitzthum, 1923) ( Figs 270–273 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ) 9. Excipulum strong, well pronounced, with the lateral margins partially overlapped by a thin cuticular lamellae (e.g. Figs 274, 280 View FIGURES 270 – 287 )............................................................................................... 10 - Excipulum weakly to moderately pronounced, its lateral margins not overlapped by the cuticular lamellae (e.g. Figs 298 View FIGURES 288 – 301 , 308 View FIGURES 302 – 314 )................................................................................................... 11 10. Gnathotectum central lobe pointed; spurs on Ge II large and high, the ones on Ti II smaller and low ( Fig. 278 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ); very narrow movable digit of chelicera with semicircular tubercle on the external (ventral) edge ( Fig. 276 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ).......................................................................................... H. rotulifer ( Willmann, 1940) ( Figs 274–278 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ) - Gnathotectum central lobe obtuse ( Fig. 281 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ); fixed digit of chelicera with one-fourth to one-third distal part—narrower ( Fig. 282 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ), in dorso-ventral perspective a tubercular to tooth-like protrusion directed laterally at pilus dentilis level is visible ( Fig. 283 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ); movable digit without any tubercle on the external (ventral) edge... H. excipuliger ( Berlese, 1906) ( Figs 229 View FIGURES 228 – 242 , 279–287 View FIGURES 270 – 287 ) 11. The pores of postcoxal glands gv2 surrounded by a thickened cuticle forming foveolae ( Fig. 293 View FIGURES 288 – 301 )..................... 12 - Cuticular foveolae around the gv2 gland pores – absent....................................................... 13 12. Axillary process on Fe II asymmetric and bent towards the segment ( Figs 290, 291 View FIGURES 288 – 301 ); cheliceral fixed digit with a lateral triangular projection ( Fig. 289 View FIGURES 288 – 301 ), seta v2 on pedipalp trochanter pectinate distally on both sides and thicker than v1. ........................................................................ H. pseudoperforatus ( Berlese, 1906) ( Figs 288–292 View FIGURES 288 – 301 ) - Axillary process on Fe II symmetric ( Figs 295, 296 View FIGURES 288 – 301 ); cheliceral fixed digit without a lateral projection ( Fig. 294 View FIGURES 288 – 301 ).......................................................................... H. pollicipatus ( Berlese, 1903) ( Figs 293–297 View FIGURES 288 – 301 ) 13. Spurs on Ge II and Ti II very similar, low and ridgelike ( Figs 300, 301 View FIGURES 288 – 301 )................................................................................................ H. kerkirensis Witaliński & Skorupski, 2002 ( Figs 298–301 View FIGURES 288 – 301 ) - Spurs on Ge II and Ti II different........................................................................ 14 14. Corniculi slender with an adaxial border only slightly sinuous; movable digit of chelicera with one large proximal tooth followed by 4–6 minute distal teeth ( Fig. 302 View FIGURES 302 – 314 ); main spur on the femur with an apical segment blunt terminally and quadrilateral, if observed from a ventral perspective ( Figs 303, 306 View FIGURES 302 – 314 )................... H. calcaratus ( Koch, 1839) ( Figs 230 View FIGURES 228 – 242 , 302–307 View FIGURES 302 – 314 ) - Corniculi with a small protuberance on the adaxial border ( Fig. 309 View FIGURES 302 – 314 ); movable digit of chelicera with one large proximal tooth followed by 2 smaller distal teeth ( Fig. 311 View FIGURES 302 – 314 )............... H. paradisiacus Witaliński & Skorupski, 2003b ( Figs 308–314 View FIGURES 302 – 314 ) 15. Ti II with several spurs, the two ventral ones huge ( Fig. 316 View FIGURES 315 – 320 )......... H. karawankianus ( Schmölzer, 1991) ( Figs 315, 316 View FIGURES 315 – 320 ) - The two huge spurs on Ti II—not encountered.............................................................. 16 16. Hypostomatic setae on a piece of cuticle separated laterally and posteriorly with narrow incisions................... 17 - Incisions in a cuticle laterally to and behind the hypostomatic setae – absent...................................... 46 17. Postcoxal gv2 glands empty into the cuticular foveolae ( Fig. 317 View FIGURES 315 – 320 ).. H. fovealis Witaliński & Skorupski, 2006 ( Figs 317–320 View FIGURES 315 – 320 ) - Cuticular foveolae behind coxae IV – absent............................................................... 18 18. Hypostome with a central part distinctly sclerotised, tongue-like (e.g. Figs 340 View FIGURES 336 – 345 , 391, 398 View FIGURES 391 – 401 ) or extended anteriorly2 ( Fig. 349 View FIGURES 346 – 360 )............................................................................ ( mallorcae species-group) 3...19 - Central part of the hypostome triangular and weakly sclerotised (e.g. Figs 232, 233 View FIGURES 228 – 242 , 451 View FIGURES 443 – 454 , 465 View FIGURES 465 – 475 )........................ 39 19. Glands gv1 absent; genital lamina rounded, heavily sclerotised on the inner face ( Figs 321, 326, 327, 332 View FIGURES 321 – 335 ); microsclerite bearing tritosternum large and trapezoidal..................................................................... 20 - Gland gv1 present; genital lamina of another shape and rather weakly sclerotised, largely transparent (e.g. Figs 373 View FIGURES 361 – 375 , 405, 411 View FIGURES 402 – 413 ); 2. Similar in appearance to those in the Rhabdocarpais males

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

SuperOrder

Parasitiformes

Order

Mesostigmata

Family

Parasitidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF