Chlamydodon obliquus Kahl, 1931
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.12651/JSR.2020.9.4.427 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13139444 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038E8795-FFF8-930A-FCE6-FB84FCF9D0B9 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Chlamydodon obliquus Kahl, 1931 |
status |
|
10. Chlamydodon obliquus Kahl, 1931 View in CoL ( Fig. 10 View Fig )
Material examined. Marine water collected from Sinwol mud flat, Goseong-eup, Goseong-gun, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea (34°56′48.60″N 128°20′27.70″E) on 6 May 2019 GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. Body size in vivo 150-240 × 110-150 μm (n = 5); outline ellipsoid to triangular; macronucleus 18- 30 μm in diameter; on average 15 irregularly distributed contractile vacuoles; cross striated band continuous, anterior portion crossing to the dorsal surface; 43-46 right, 4 postoral, and 26-36 left kineties; about 7 terminal fragments on dorsal side; 11-14 nematodesmal rods.
Distribution. China, U.S.A., and Korea.
Remarks. The Korean population of C. obliquus is similar to the Chinese population ( Gong et al., 2005) in most aspects. However, they differ in two overlapping features: the body size (150-220 μm vs. 120-180 μm) and the total number of somatic kineties (73-86 vs. 63-74). Chlamydodon obliquus can be easily distinguished from the closely related species C. bourlandi by the number of the contractile vacuoles (ca. 15 vs. 40-68), which is considered an important character to separate Chlamydodon spp. ( Qu et al., 2018).
Voucher slides. Two slides with protargol-impregnated specimens were deposited at National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBRPR0000110194, NIBRPR000011 195).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |