Brincadorus Oman , 1938
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5497.4.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1B87563E-2BC9-4665-B5AE-B5EDBD4F541E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13621389 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038D87A5-B93E-9E3D-2491-FF4DD6DE6218 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Brincadorus Oman , 1938 |
status |
|
Brincadorus Oman, 1938 View in CoL
( Figures 1–8 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 )
Additional literature citations:
Evans, 1947: 219 (classification). Oman, 1938: 361 (generic description). Linnavuori, 1959: 158 (revision of Neotropical Deltocephalinae ). Metcalf, 1966: 183 (catalogue). Zanol & Menezes, 1982: 38 (catalogue). Oman et al., 1990: 196 (catalogue). Zahniser, 2007 (on-line catalogue). Zanol, 2008: 14 (catalogue). Zahniser & Dietrich 2013: 49 (phylogeny of Deltocephalinae and description of tribe). Cao et al. 2022 (phylogeny of Deltocephalinae ).
Type-species: Brincadorus laticeps Oman, 1938.
Length: 5.0– 7.4 mm.
Coloration: Body mostly yellow dorsally and ventrally.
External morphology: Head short, crown not produced anteriorly, transocular width more than two times width of eye; transocular width subequal to pronotum width; coronal suture visible; crown surface smooth; frontal region flat or convex; anterior margin with numerous transverse fine carinae ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ); transition from crown to face angled; lateral frontal suture reaching only partway to ocellus; ocellus medium sized, on anterior margin of head, close to eye, distance between ocellus and eye more than twice the diameter of ocellus; eye with mesal margin entire. Antennal ledges present, weakly developed. Clypellar suture complete; straight or arcuate. Clypellus tumid in lateral view, slightly constricted at base and narrowing toward apex, or not constricted at base and tapering apically, apex following natural curve of gena. Gena incised laterally; single fine erect seta close to lateral frontal suture present. Lorum narrower than clypellus near base, close to lower genal margin. Frontoclypeus shagreen, shorter than wide.
Pronotum with transverse ridges and furrows, with distinct lateral carina. Scutellum not inflated.
Forewing rounded apically; macropterous; with or without crossveins on costal margin; outer anteapical cell truncate; inner anteapical cell open; corium with or without extra crossveins; vein R 1 diverging distad of R fork; with crossvein between A1 vein and claval suture; without crossvein between veins A1 and A2; appendix restricted to anal margin.
Profemur with AM 1 and intercalary row of setae present; row AV with short or long macrosetae reaching midlength of profemur; with 2 apical setae. Protibia anterodorsal margin rounded. Mesofemur row AV with short, stout macrosetae, AV apical setae present. Metafemur setal formula 2+2+1. Metatarsomere I longer than metatarsomeres II and III combined; pecten with three platellate setae; PV apical seta acuminate.
Male genitalia: Pygofer incised to near mid-length; without developed rows of macrosetae; dorsal process present, thick at base, constricted medially, apically bifurcate with short, blunt dorsal rami and with longer, falcate ventral rami; posterior margin truncate. Valve subtriangular, articulated with pygofer. Subgenital plate triangular, articulated with valve; outer lateral margin slightly convex in ventral view; inner margin excavated medially; plates widely separated and extending dorsad along pygofer side; apex acuminate or bifurcate; without developed macrosetae. Connective articulated to aedeagus; arms appressed anteriorly or slightly divergent, stem longer or shorter than arms. Style preapical lobe absent; apophysis shorter than rest of style; reaching or not reaching apex of connective. Aedeagus with or without basidorsal and apical processes; gonopore subapical or apical. Phragma forming pair of membranous or partly sclerotized processes extending over aedeagal shaft, with setae dorsally. Segment X sclerotized.
Female terminalia: Pygofer with macrosetae near posterior margin. Internal abdominal sternite VIII membranous. Valvulae I convex ventrally; shaft with dorsal sculpturing pattern imbricate with individual scales arranged in more or less even, oblique rows. Valvulae II with numerous close-set subtriangular teeth on dorsal margin beyond membranous notch, each bearing small denticles on the anterior and posterior margin. Gonoplacs with apex rounded, with small setae on ventral margin.
Diagnosis: The genus can be distinguished by its larger size (5.0 to 7.4 mm), short head, transition of crown to face angled, anterior margin of head with numerous transverse carinae, male pygofer and subgenital plate without macrosetae, male pygofer with a pair of internal processes arising dorsally, subgenital plates rising dorsad along pygofer side and with internal margin excavated medially, and unique shape of styles, with long anterior arm.
Notes: Oman (1938) treated the genus as a member of the subfamily Aphrodinae , and regarded it as related to Stroggylocephalus Flor, 1861 , a genus recorded from the Old World. Evans (1947) placed the genus in the tribe Selenocephalini , which belonged to the subfamily Iassinae at the time. Linnavuori (1959) correctly included Brincadorus in Deltocephalinae , due to the male genital structure. Zahniser & Dietrich (2013) included the genus in Bahitini , but it is here considered unplaced to tribe (see Discussion).
List and distribution of species of Brincadorus
Brincadorus cruceno sp. nov. Bolivia: José Ballivián and Santa Cruz Departments; Peru: Huánuco and San Martín Regions.
Brincadorus gracilis sp. nov. Ecuador: Sucumbíos Province; Peru: Huánuco Region.
Brincadorus laticeps Oman, 1938. Brazil: Mato Grosso (see the notes section below).
Brincadorus limoncocha sp. nov. Ecuador: Sucumbíos Province.
Brincadorus quincemil sp. nov. Peru: Cusco Region.
Brincadorus yanayacu sp. nov. Ecuador: Tungurahia and Sucumbíos Province.
Brincadorus sp. (unidentified female). Brazil: Rio de Janeiro State.
Taxonomic key to males of Brincadorus
1 Aedeagus without basidorsal process ( Fig. 1G View FIGURE 1 ).............................................................. 2
- Aedeagus with basidorsal process ( Figs. 4F View FIGURE 4 , 5H View FIGURE 5 )............................................................. 4
2(1) Aedeagus shaft short and slightly expanded at midlength, becoming narrower towards apex in lateral view ( Figs. 7F–G View FIGURE 7 )...................................................................................... Brincadorus yanayacu
- Aedeagus shaft long and slender, without expansions in lateral view ( Figs. 1G–H View FIGURE 1 , 2F–G View FIGURE 2 )............................ 3
3(2) Aedeagus with pre–apical spine dorsally, apical region curved downward ( Figs. 2F–G View FIGURE 2 ).............. Brincadorus cruceno
- Aedeagus without pre–apical spine dorsally, apical region somewhat straight ( Figs. 1G–H View FIGURE 1 )........... Brincadorus laticeps
4(1) Aedeagus with basidorsal process strongly bifurcate; without apical process ( Figs. 5H–I View FIGURE 5 .......... Brincadorus limoncocha
- Aedeagus with basidorsal process not bifurcate; with flap–like apical process ( Figs. 4F–G View FIGURE 4 , 6F–G View FIGURE 6 )..................... 5
5(4) Subgenital plate apex bifurcate ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ); aedeagus with wide apical extension; basidorsal process with rami short ( Figs. 6F–G View FIGURE 6 )............................................................................. Brincadorus quincemil
- Subgenital plate apex not bifurcate ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ); aedeagus with basidorsal processes longer and slender ( Figs. 4F–G View FIGURE 4 )............................................................................................ Brincadorus gracilis
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
AM |
Australian Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |