Parastephanellus evexus Tan & van Achterberg, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4459.2.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:80274354-1EC7-4E81-A672-A01259FB66C2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5971496 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038D879A-7A01-FFB5-FF68-AC9B0EB6B152 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Parastephanellus evexus Tan & van Achterberg |
status |
sp. nov. |
Parastephanellus evexus Tan & van Achterberg , sp. n.
Figs 43–61 View FIGURES 43-44 View FIGURES 45–54 View FIGURE 55 View FIGURES 56–61
Parastephanellus brevistigma ; Chen et al. 2016a: 119 –122 (♂).
Type material. Holotype, ♀ ( NWUX): “[SE China:] Jiangxi, Quannan, 650 m, 16.vi.2008, Sichang Li ” . Paratypes: 1 ♂ ( NWUX): topotypic and same data ; 1 ♂ ( SCAU): “[SE China:] Guangdong, Nanling National Nature Reserve, 6.x.2004, Zaifu Xu ”
Diagnosis. Ivory streak of temple distinctly contrasting with dark brown posterior part of temple in lateral view ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 45–54 ), separated from occipital carina in dorsal view ( Figs 53 View FIGURES 45–54 , 60 View FIGURES 56–61 ); temples of ♀ strongly angulate in dorsal view ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 45–54 ); frons of ♀ dark brown; medio-anteriorly pronotum gradually arising behind neck ( Figs 43 View FIGURES 43-44 , 47 View FIGURES 45–54 ); pronotum below tegulae costate ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 45–54 ); posterior part of pronotum and mesoscutum moderately high in lateral view ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 43-44 ); vein 1-M of fore wing approx. 1.2 × vein m-cu and 1.8–1.9 × vein 1-SR ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 45–54 ); vein 1-SR of fore wing strongly angled with vein 1-M and as long as vein 2-M+CU1 ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 45–54 ); vein m-cu of fore wing approx. 1.5 × longer than vein 2-SR+M; sclerotized part of vein 2-M of fore wing up to level of apex of vein r; first metasomal tergite of ♀ very slender and approx. 9.5 × as long as wide ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 43-44 ); pygidial area of ♀ moderately emarginated apically, not protruding and rounded latero-apically ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 45–54 ); ovipositor sheath approximately as long as body and 1.8 × as long as fore wing.
Runs in the key to Parastephanellus by Elliott (1928) either to P. rubripictus Elliott, 1917 , or to P. crassicoxae Elliott, 1928 . The new species differs from P. rubripictus by having the frons coarsely vermiculate-rugose (rugosepunctate in P. rubripictus ), the moderately wide and medium-sized pterostigma (long and narrow), the first tergite 0.8 × as long as remainder of metasoma (of equal length), the neck with transverse carinae (with longitudinal carinae) and the coarsely foveolate propodeum (coarsely reticulate-rugose). It differs from P. crassicoxae by having the hind coxa elongated (very stout in P. crassicoxae ), the coarsely foveolate propodeum (reticulatepunctate) and the propleuron largely smooth (transversely aciculate).
Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 13.5 mm, of fore wing 7.6 mm, and of ovipositor sheath 13.0 mm.
Head. Antenna incomplete, with 10 segments remaining, third segment with one circular sensillum ventrally, fourth segment with 4 circular sensilla; frons coarsely vermiculate-rugose ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 45–54 ); three anterior coronal teeth large and lobe-shaped ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 45–54 ), both posterior ones wider and arcuate; vertex largely coarsely rugose anteriorly, largely smooth posteriorly, only medially transversely aciculate; temple strongly convex, smooth and shiny ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 45–54 ), angulate in dorsal view ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 45–54 ).
Mesosoma. Neck short and transversely carinate, anteriorly distinctly emarginated ( Figs 46–48 View FIGURES 45–54 ), posteriorly with transverse groove in front of oblique posterior part of pronotum ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 45–54 ), posterior part rugulose medioanteriorly, costate below tegula ( Figs 47, 48 View FIGURES 45–54 ); propleuron largely smooth and shiny except laterally; mesopleuron rather shiny (except anteriorly), superficially coriaceous and medially foveolate ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 45–54 ), anteriorly densely yellowish setose; scutellum finely aciculate medially and with foveolae laterally ( Fig. 48 View FIGURES 45–54 ); propodeum coarsely foveolate and with narrow coriaceous interspaces ( Figs 47, 48 View FIGURES 45–54 ); metapleuron very coarsely foveolate, convex medially.
Wings. Fore wing ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 45–54 ): pterostigma 5.8 × as long as wide and rather abruptly rounded apically; vein 1-M 1.9 × as long as vein 1-SR and 1.2 × vein m-cu; vein 1-SR as long as vein 2-SR+M; vein cu-a distinctly antefurcal and reclivous; vein 2-SR 1.5 × as long as vein r; vein r ends near level of apex of pterostigma; basal part of pterostigma twice as long as apical part ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 43-44 ); vein 1-M and vein r distinctly curved; vein 1-SR as long as parastigmal vein; vein 3-CU1 largely nebulous and widened posteriorly, only basal 0.1 tubular ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 45–54 ).
Legs. Hind coxa elongated, 3.4 × longer than wide, with small flattened granulate dorso-lateral area ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 45–54 ), largely coarsely rugose; hind femur coriaceous, ventrally with 2 large teeth and one smaller basal tooth ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 45–54 ); hind tibia 1.2 × as long as hind femur, largely coriaceous and ventrally with oblique carinae, inner side with distinct v-shaped impression, basal narrow part of hind tibia as long as widened part; ventral length of hind basitarsus 4.7 × as long as wide.
Metasoma. First tergite densely transversely striate, 9.5 × as long as its maximum width ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 43-44 ), 2.5 × second tergite and 0.8 × metasoma without first tergite; second tergite basally with some rugae; remainder of metasoma rather shiny and very superficially cellular-coriaceous; pygidial area triangularly depressed, apically moderately circularly emarginated and latero-apically rounded, not protruding ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 45–54 ); ovipositor sheath nearly as long as body ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 43-44 ).
Colour. Black or blackish brown; temple with ivory streak along eye long, well differentiated and nearly up to occipital carina ( Figs 46, 53 View FIGURES 45–54 ); middle tibia basally and narrowly apically and most of middle basitarsus white; remainder of tarsi and four basal antennal segments brown; palpi pale yellowish but basally dark brown; face, temple posteriorly, frons ventrally, pronotum ventrally, propleuron, fore leg largely (except tarsus), middle coxa and femur, metasoma apically and ventrally (except first tergite), hind tibia largely, pterostigma (except whitish base) and veins dark brown; apex of hind coxa partly ivory ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 45–54 ); wing membrane subhyaline.
Male. Length of body 7.6 mm, of fore wing 4.3 mm, antenna with 26 segments. Similar to female but frons brownish yellow ( Fig. 59 View FIGURES 56–61 ), vertex mainly regularly transversely striate but rugose anteriorly, temples evenly rounded in dorsal view ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 56–61 ), foveolation of mesopleuron, metapleuron and propodeum reduced, flattened area of hind coxa larger and coxa 3.9 × longer than wide), first tergite 8.7 × longer than wide and base of second tergite orange brown. Parameres moderately convex and setose ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 56–61 ).
Distribution. China (* Guangdong, * Jiangxi).
Etymology. Named “ evexus ” (Latin for “rounded at the top”), because of the rounded apex of the metasoma of the ♀.
Notes. The male of P. brevicoxalis sensu Chen et al. (2016) is transferred to this species, because of the slender first tergite (nearly 11 × as long as wide, Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18–26 ; not the description!), the reduced dentition basally of the median tooth of the hind femur, the venation of the fore wing, and the dorsally narrow ivory streak of temple. The gradually sloping pronotum and normal hind coxa (about 3 × as long as wide) fit in with this transfer. Only the colour of the posterior part of the temple differs: rather dark brown in the paratype from Jiangxi and brown in the paratype from Guangdong.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Parastephanellus evexus Tan & van Achterberg
Tan, Jiang-Li, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Tan, Qing-Qing, Zhou, Tong & Li, Tao 2018 |
Parastephanellus brevistigma
Chen et al. 2016a : 119 |