Agyneta maritima ( Emerton 1919 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3674.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:981F80ED-96D7-40C7-8A3C-677954416A2E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6162313 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038D6700-FF97-5639-118C-00B0AC4BB3B2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Agyneta maritima ( Emerton 1919 ) |
status |
|
Agyneta maritima ( Emerton 1919) View in CoL
Figs 26 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 , 130–136 View FIGURES 130 – 136 , map 7
Microneta maritima Emerton 1919: 4 , pl. 1, f. 8–10. (Description 3).
Meioneta maritima Leech 1966: 186 , f. 62–64. (Transferred 3 from Microneta View in CoL , description Ƥ).
Meioneta alaskensis Holm 1960: 127 , f. 32–34. (Holotype 3, allotype Ƥ from Alaska, Meade River (157º:71º) 8-9 Aug. 1958, C. Lindroth, MCZ) EXAMINED.
Agyneta maritima Eskov 1992: 75 View in CoL , 81. (Transferred from Meioneta and Meioneta alaskensis Holm 1960 was synonomized with A. maritima View in CoL . This synonymy was rejected by Saaristo and Koponen 1998. SYNONYMY REAFFIRMED).
Agyneta alaskensis Saaristo & Koponen 1998: 574 View in CoL , f. 8A–C, E.
Diagnosis: Males are distinguished from most Agyneta by the bifid tip of their lamella characteristica ( Fig. 130 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). To distinguish from A. nigripes , see diagnosis of the latter. Females are distinguished from most Agyneta by the presence of a deep pit hook depression ( Fig. 134 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). From closely related species by their wider pit hook depression ( Fig. 134 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ), narrower in A. rurestris , A. jacksoni and A. dynica ( Figs 112 View FIGURES 108 – 115 , 120 View FIGURES 116 – 122 , 127 View FIGURES 123 – 129 , 141 View FIGURES 137 – 143 ).
Description: Male: Total length 2.06; carapace length 0.88, width 0.69.
MAP. 7. Localities of Agyneta maritima ( Emerton 1919) .
CEPHALOTHORAX: Carapace dark brown, shiny, finely reticulate; suffused with dark gray along margin, radiating lines; trident mark present. Sternum brown strongly suffused with dark gray. Clypeus height 2. Chelicerae orange-brown, apical part lighter, strongly excavated; ~12 seta-tipped tubercles; promargin two denticles, retromargin three denticles, both margins with rounded projections near base of fang ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 ). Cheliceral stridulatory organ ~37 striae, well spaced throughout. ABDOMEN: Uniformly dark gray. LEGS: Yellow-orange; leg I total length: 2.82; leg III total length: 2.13; Tm I: 0.24, Tm IV: absent. GENITALIA: Palpal retrolateral tibial apophysis short, rugose; dorsal tibial apophysis wide, rugose; two retrolateral trichobothria and a dorsal one ( Fig. 130 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). Cymbium triangular; glabrous depression present ( Fig. 130 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ); dorsal cymbial tubercle triangular, smooth; ventral cymbial tubercle absent; prolateral notch shallow ( Fig. 131 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). Paracymbium apical pocket short, anterior and posterior pockets short and curved ( Fig. 130 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). Embolus tip pointed, concave; dorso-ventrally spiny; basally with two spurs; Fickert’s gland absent; ventral lamella serrated, transparent; thumb short reaching well below the embolus proper ( Fig. 132 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). Embolus proper set apically, dorsal part wider and serrated ( Fig. 132 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). Anterior terminal apophysis narrow with long protrusions; posterior terminal apophysis wide, striate; lamella characteristica large, margin dentate basally, ending in four large spikes ( Fig. 133 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ).
Female: Total length 2.16; carapace length 0.81, width 0.63.
CEPHALOTHORAX: Same coloration as male. Chelicerae yellow; promargin four teeth, retromargin five denticles. Cheliceral stridulatory organ visible ~26 striae, well spaced. ABDOMEN: Same as male. LEGS: Same as male; palpal tibia and tarsus brownish, tarsal claw absent; leg I total length: 2.81; leg III total length: 2.21; Tm I: 0.26; Tm IV: absent. GENITALIA: Epigynum with wide proximal part of scape, sides straight and vertical; epigynal slits oval and short; pit hook depression deep ( Fig. 134 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ); lateral lobes wide and short; stretcher seemingly absent ( Fig. 135 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). Median part of scape long and wide with constrictions; genital pores situated at base of lateral lobes pockets ( Fig. 136 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). Internal genitalia with a rounded ventral receptacula and a small, oval dorsal one ( Figs 135, 136 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ).
Other material examined: CANADA: Northwest Territories: Norman Wells, 25.vi.1949, 231Ƥ, W. Mason ( CNC). Nunavut: Baker Lake, 14.vii.1947, 131Ƥ, T. Freeman ( AMNH); Ellesmere Island, 04.vii.1980, 23, J.R. Smith ( CNC); Hazen Camp, 06.vi.1963, 131Ƥ, 10.vii.1964, 131Ƥ, 16.vi.1964, 23, 20.vi.1964, 233Ƥ, 28.vi.1964, 1Ƥ, 02.viii.1964, 3Ƥ, R. Leech ( CNC); Rasmussen Basin, 08.viii.1977, cotton grass meadow, 131Ƥ, T. Hogg ( DBC); Truelove Inlet, Devon Island, 16–21. vi.1973, 1 Ƥ, J. Daley ( DBC). USA: Alaska: Brooks Range, Araktuvuk Pass, on mountain, 3.2km W of village, 16.viii.1960, along stream, 1Ƥ, A. Holm, O. Martensson ( AMNH); Brooks Range, Feniak Lake, 02.viii.1961, 131Ƥ, A. Holm, O. Martensson ( AMNH); North Slope Brgh., Meade River, 96km S Barrow, 06.vi.1978, 23, 15.vi.1978, 332Ƥ, 17.vi.1978, 131Ƥ, 24.vi.1978, 131Ƥ, 27.vi.1978, 131Ƥ, 02.vii.1978, 731Ƥ, 05.vii.1978, 1Ƥ, 11.vii.1978, 233Ƥ, 20.vii.1978, 436Ƥ, 20.viii.1978, 2Ƥ, 10.viii.1980, 1Ƥ, B. Vogel ( AMNH); North Slope, lake, 1.6km W Jago river, 23.vii–06.viii.1962, tundra, 131Ƥ, C. Lewis ( AMNH); SW Rock Mountain, 1264m, 13–14.vi.1994, pitfalls, alpine tundra, E. West ( UWBM); Yukon Border, Firth River, E facing slope of Mountain, 1.6km SE Mancha Creek, 12.viii.1961, limestone, 2Ƥ, K. Stone ( AMNH).
Distribution: Siberian-Nearctic ( Tanasevitch & Koponen 2007).
Note: After examining the holotypes of A. maritima and A. alaskensis , studying the palpal embolic division and the female internal genitalia of many specimens from Northwest Territories, Nunavut and Alaska, I found no consistent morphological differences suggesting two distinct species. I did observed the variation in size, carapace color and serration of the male palpal lamella characteristica mentioned by Saaristo & Koponen 1998 (p. 572, 574; figs 6, 8). But those minor morphological differences fall within the range of variation observed in other species of Agyneta (eg. A. fillmorana , A. sheffordiana , A. amersaxatilis ), therefore A. alaskensis synonymy with A. maritima is reaffirmed following Eskov (1994).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Agyneta maritima ( Emerton 1919 )
Dupérré, Nadine 2013 |
Agyneta alaskensis
Saaristo 1998: 574 |
Agyneta maritima
Eskov 1992: 75 |
Meioneta alaskensis
Holm 1960: 127 |
Microneta maritima
Emerton 1919: 4 |