Tennesseellum Petrunkevitch 1925
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3674.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:981F80ED-96D7-40C7-8A3C-677954416A2E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6162488 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038D6700-FF17-56BA-118C-068CAC57B09A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tennesseellum Petrunkevitch 1925 |
status |
|
Tennesseellum Petrunkevitch 1925 View in CoL View at ENA
Tennesseellum Petrunkevitch 1925: 173 View in CoL . Type species Tennesseellum formicum ( Petrunkevitch 1925) = Bathyphantes formica Emerton 1882 .
Diagnosis: Members of this genus resemble species of Agyneta and Anibontes , but differ from the latter and all other North American Linyphiidae by the position of the spiracle, distant from the spinnerets ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 31 – 33 ).
Description: Male: Total length: 1.5–1.6. Carapace: flat, elongate-oval, strongly granulate ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 9 – 16. 9 ), suffused with dark gray along margin and radiating lines, fovea well marked. Clypeus: height 2–3 ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 9 – 16. 9 ), straight in lateral view. Eyes: rounded, anterior median eye equal or smaller than other eyes ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 9 – 16. 9 ); posterior eye row slightly procurved to straight in dorsal view ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 9 – 16. 9 ). Sternum: smooth slightly longer than wide or as long as wide. Endites: as long as wide, serrula present; occasionally with seta-tipped tubercles. Labium: rebordered, fused to sternum. Chelicerae: longer than wide, excavated ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 9 – 16. 9 ); paturon sometimes with tubercles ( Fig. 584 View FIGURES 580 – 587 ); promargin and retromargin with denticles; cheliceral stridulatory organ present ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 17 – 24. 17 ). Abdomen: cylindrical or oval, with or without pattern, sigilla sometimes present ( Fig. 574 View FIGURES 570 – 579 ). Colulus: triangular with setae. Legs: uniformly colored; leg formula 4123; prolateral spine on tibia I absent; femur I–III with paired ventral apical spines, single on femur IV; tibia I–IV with two small dorsal spines, Tm I: 0.29–0.31, Tm IV: absent. Respiratory system: demistracheate ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 31 – 33 ); with two wide median trachea, two smaller lateral trachea, wide and fused to the median trachea and one spiracle ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 31 – 33 ). Genitalia: Male palpal femur sometimes with large prongs ( Fig. 570 View FIGURES 570 – 579 arrows); tibia with one retrolateral and one dorsal trichobothria ( Figs 570 View FIGURES 570 – 579 , 580 View FIGURES 580 – 587 ). Cymbium triangular; glabrous depression present with curved ridge ( Figs 570 View FIGURES 570 – 579 , 580 View FIGURES 580 – 587 ); dorsal and ventral cymbial tubercles absent; prolateral notch absent ( Figs 571 View FIGURES 570 – 579 , 581 View FIGURES 580 – 587 ). Paracymbium with apical pocket and anterior pocket present, posterior pocket absent ( Figs 570 View FIGURES 570 – 579 , 580 View FIGURES 580 – 587 ). Embolus sickle-shaped; ventral lamella absent; thumb short, reaching below the embolus proper ( Figs 572 View FIGURES 570 – 579 , 582 View FIGURES 580 – 587 ). Embolus proper set apically; Fickert’s gland absent ( Figs 572 View FIGURES 570 – 579 , 582 View FIGURES 580 – 587 ). Anterior terminal apophysis large, striated with numerous, long protrusions; posterior terminal apophysis pointed; lamella characteristica variable ( Figs 573 View FIGURES 570 – 579 , 583 View FIGURES 580 – 587 ).
Female: Total length: 1.6–2.4. Carapace: slightly elevated, oval, finely granulate; suffused with dark gray along margin and radiating lines; trident mark sometimes present; fovea not well marked. Clypeus: height 1–1.5, straight in lateral view. Eyes: rounded, all equal in size, posterior eye row slightly procurved to straight in dorsal view. Chelicerae: not excavated, promargin and retromargin with teeth; cheliceral stridulatory organ present. Sternum: as long as wide. Abdomen: oval, with or without pattern, sigilla sometimes present ( Fig. 575 View FIGURES 570 – 579 ). Spinnerets: (studied for T. formicum only), ALS with one major ampullate spigot and at least five piriform spigots, PMS with one cylindrical, two aciniform and one minor ampullate spigot, PLS with two cylindrical, three to four aciniform spigots, two aggregate and one flagelliform spigot ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 17 – 24. 17 ). Colulus: triangular with three setae ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 17 – 24. 17 ). Legs: uniformly colored; leg formula 4123; prolateral spine on tibia I absent; femur I–III with paired ventral apical spines, single on femur IV; tibia I–IV with two small dorsal spines, Tm I: 0.30–0.35, Tm IV: absent; palp normal or inflated; claw absent. Genitalia: Epigynum consisting of folded scape; proximal part of scape wide; median part of scape variable; lateral lobes short; stretcher small ( Figs 576 View FIGURES 570 – 579 , 586 View FIGURES 580 – 587 ). The genital pores position is variable, can be situated at the lateral lobes pockets or in the median part of scape ( Figs 579 View FIGURES 570 – 579 , 587 View FIGURES 580 – 587 ). The copulatory ducts are straight and runs from the genital pores to the receptacula ( Fig. 577 View FIGURES 570 – 579 ). The internal genitalia is composed of two receptacula; the fertizilation ducts are short and directed inward ( Figs 578 View FIGURES 570 – 579 , 587 View FIGURES 580 – 587 ).
Composition: Tennesseellum currently contains two described species: T. formicum ( Emerton 1882) and T. gollum Dupérré 2013 .
Distribution: Nearctic, T. formicum probably introduced in the Marshall Islands.
Natural History: T. formicum has been found in a wide range of natural habitats, in Newfoundland Pickavance & Dondale (2005) found specimens in mixed coniferous woods, Crawford & Edwards (1989) reported the species above tree line on Mount St. Helens and Muma (1980) reported its presence in Pinyon-Juniper and in arid grassland in New Mexico. Furthermore, the presence of T. formicum has been reported in several non-natural habitats. It is also found in agrosystem environments such as, soybean plantations, alfalfa fields, cabbage fields and citrus groves ( Whitcomb et al. 1963, Mansour et al. 1982, Bishop & Reichert 1990, Young & Edwards 1990, Schmaedick & Shelton 2000). Apparently T. formicum is able to survive in natural and non-natural habitats. In fact, Kelton et al. (2011), in their study of phenological dynamics in alfalfa ecosystems, showed that T. formicum life cycles matches the phenology of an alfafa ecosystem and that the spider population can survive agronomic disturbance at the egg stage. This capability to colonise and subsist in different types of habitats enabled T.
formicum to establish itself almost all over North America. This association of T. formicum with agrosystem environments is well established, so much so that it has been qualified as an agrobiont species ( Bolduc et al. 2005).
Bolduc et al. ’s (2005) study of ground dwellling spiders in two vineyards established that T. formicum shows phenotypic variations and has a multivoltine life cycle. T. formicum has also been collected while ballooning in eastern Texas ( Dean & Sterling 1990). In their study, males where evenly distributed from May to September, while females were collected in August and September.
Some Hymenoptera View in CoL such as Miscophus kansensis View in CoL , Trypoxylon frigidum frigidum View in CoL and T. kolazyi View in CoL have been reported to prey upon T. formicum ( Krombein et al. 1979) . Peterson et al. (2010) showed that T. formicum in laboratory can feed on pollen grains dusted on their webs, another interesting adaptation that could explain its success in colonizing differents habitats.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Tennesseellum Petrunkevitch 1925
Dupérré, Nadine 2013 |
Tennesseellum
Petrunkevitch 1925: 173 |