Pseudeudorella, Mühlenhardt-Siegel, Ute, 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.183181 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6229787 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038A8788-2961-1961-FF24-40A109FEB7D2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pseudeudorella |
status |
gen. nov. |
Pseudeudorella gen. nov.
Type species: Pseudeudorella redacticruris ( Waling and McCann, 1997) comb. nov.
Diagnosis. Habitus very similar to Eudorella , but pereiopod 5 absent in both sexes, males with strongly developed penial lobes.
Etymology. The new genus is named after the genus Eudorella , which it strongly resembles.
Remarks. The penial lobes between the pereiopods 5 within the order Cumacea vary a lot. There are conical forms in the genus Archaeocuma (family Lampropidae /Archaeocumatidae), or two cylindrical penes with a copulatory organ in the genus Campylaspenis (family Nannastacidae ). The penial lobes in the new genus Pseudeudorella are cylindrical with two relatively long subterminal pappose setae ( Watling and McCann, 1997, Figure 2.21, p. 157).
Day (1978) and Ledoyer (1988) were not convinced that the presence of penial lobes is a sufficient difference to warrant the erection of a new genus or family. Watling and McCann (1997) followed this statement, but they made a restriction and stated that “this view may change as more of these aberrant forms are discovered”. They argued that a single character is not sufficient enough to erect a new genus. However, the second character of the new genus, missing pereiopod 5 in both sexes, makes the new genus unique and easy to distinguish from Eudorella .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |