Diguetia balandra, Jimenez & Cardiel & Chamé-Vázquez, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5205.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C86D3484-9A3C-4285-AB35-700FD8817EB8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7310451 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038987B6-FFBE-FF95-D0CD-FA30FE58FA1A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Diguetia balandra |
status |
sp. nov. |
Diguetia balandra sp. nov.
Figs 1–29 View FIGURES 1–10 View FIGURES 11–16 View FIGURES 17–29 , 109 View FIGURES 109–110 .
Type material. ♂ Holotype from MEXICO: Baja California Sur: Municipality of La Paz, La Paz , Balandra Hill (24.32558°N, 110.32675°W, 73m), 26.IX.2018, leg. C. Palacios (CARCIB-Ar 0032) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: same data as holotype, 19.IX.2017, 1♂ 9♀ (CARCIB-Ar 0209) GoogleMaps ; same data as holotype, 3♀ 6imm. (CARCIB-Ar 0211) GoogleMaps ; same data as holotype, 2♀ (CARCIB-Ar 0210) GoogleMaps ; same data as holotype, 1♀ (CARCIB-Ar 0004) GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific name is a noun taken from the type locality.
Diagnosis. Diguetia balandra sp. nov. resembles D. canities , D. dialectica stat. reval., and D. stridulans by having an opisthosoma with a middle dorsal band with two posterior scalloped white bands ( Figs 2, 6 View FIGURES 1–10 ) but in D. canities these bands are flanked with darker bands ( Gertsch, 1958: fig. 1), in D. dialectica stat. reval. the scalloped bands are thin ( Figs 31, 35 View FIGURES 30–39 , 59, 62 View FIGURES 56–66 ), and in D. stridulans the opisthosoma has distinctive long, coarse setae. Moreover, D. balandra sp. nov. differs from D. canities and D. dialectica stat. reval. in the leg formula 4123 instead of 1423. The ring pattern of legs of D. balandra sp. nov. and D. dialectica stat. reval. are attenuate ( Figs 28–29 View FIGURES 17–29 ; 54–55 View FIGURES 46–55 ), while in D. canities it is well-marked, and the rings are absent in D. stridulans . Females of D. balandra sp. nov. have conspicuous long, thick macrosetae on metatarsus IV ( Figs 24, 29 View FIGURES 17–29 ), while D. canities , D. stridulans , and D. dialectica stat. reval. have short and thin macrosetae as in other species. The membranous median sac of D. balandra sp. nov. and D. dialectica stat. reval. are similar, but the sac of the former is longer ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 1–10 ), while in D. canities the apical portion is subspherical ( Gertsch, 1958: fig. 18). Moreover, the male bulb prong in D. balandra sp. nov. is shorter (half the length of embolus, see Figs 13, 16 View FIGURES 11–16 ) than in D. canities and D. dialectica stat. reval., which is more than half the length of the embolus ( Figs 42, 45 View FIGURES 40–45 ; Gertsch, 1958: fig. 16). The embolus tip of D. balandra sp. nov. and D. canities are similar ( Figs 13, 16 View FIGURES 11–16 , 17 View FIGURES 17–29 ), as both lack the tip attenuated and bent as in D. dialectica stat. reval. ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 40–45 ).
Description. Male (holotype CARCIB-Ar 0032). Coloration: carapace and chelicerae dark yellow with scarce setae, fovea inconspicuous but with a depressed area from where two bands of white setae emerge towards the ocular area, carapace margins, and clypeus with white setae, eyes with black rings ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–10 , 25 View FIGURES 17–29 ). Endites pale yellow with scarce white setae and margins darker. Labium and sternum brown, the latter with margins dark and white setae ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–10 ). Legs I–IV light yellow, Fm I lighter proximally, Ti I, and Mt I darker than Fm I. Pt II and Ti II slightly darker, Ti II with a dark distal ring and Mt with darker sides. Pt III darker, Ti III, Mt III and Ta III with a dark distal ring. All segments of leg IV with dark distal ring ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 17–29 ). Dorsum and sides of opisthosoma greyish, covered with white and dark setae, dorsum with a longitudinal dark band, broadened posteriorly with a wavy margin and bordered more densely with white setae ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–10 ). Venter of opisthosoma dark brown, epigastric area darker, and spinnerets black ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–10 ). Habitus: carapace oval, cephalic region slightly narrower than thoracic region ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–10 ). Front face of chelicerae is very rugged, the stridulatory file occupies almost all lateral face. Promargin of chelicerae with a transparent lamina and two distal teeth; retromargin with three small teeth. Labium, endites and sternum longer than wide ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–10 ). Trochanters of all legs without notch; Ta and Mt without scopula; paired pectinate claws with ten teeth. Metatarsal lyriform organ with eight slits in dorsal view ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 17–29 ). Ta I with false sutures. Opisthosoma without caudal extension. Palp: Fm with three ventrolateral stridulating pins (arrow in Figs 11, 13 View FIGURES 11–16 ), Ta with two finger-like processes, the prolateral one shorter ( Figs 11 View FIGURES 11–16 , 17 View FIGURES 17–29 ), the suboval bulb narrows apically (0.7 long, 0.3 wide; Figs 13–16 View FIGURES 11–16 ), with spoon-shaped embolus (0.3 long) and straight tubular prong, half the length of the embolus (0.16 long) ( Figs 11–17 View FIGURES 11–16 View FIGURES 17–29 ). Measurements: total length 4.8; carapace 2.25 long, 1.37 wide; clypeus height 0.16; chelicerae length 0.56. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.13, ALE 0.13, PME 0.13; AME–ALE 0.09, AME–PME 0.16. Length of legs segments: I 9.9 (3.0, 0.7, 2.9, 2.1, 1.2), II 8.8 (2.8, 0.6, 2.4, 2.3, 0.7), III 6.8 (2.2, 0.5, 1.6, 1.8, 0.7) IV 10.1 (3.2, 0.5, 2.6, 3.0, 0.8). Leg formula 4123.
Female (CARCIB-Ar 0004). Coloration: as the male but carapace and chelicerae light brown, the later with dark lateral sides ( Figs 5–8 View FIGURES 1–10 ). Sternum, endites and labium darker than in male ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1–10 ). Palps light yellow and black macrosetae. Legs I–IV light yellow, Pt I–IV darker than other segments; Ta I–IV and Mt I–IV darker distally. Fm IV and Ti IV with dark distal ring, Pt IV dark brown lateral sides, Mt IV dark-yellow with very long macrosetae ( Figs 24, 29 View FIGURES 17–29 ). Dorsum and venter of opisthosoma as in male, although epigastric area with long black setae and hyaline setae ( Figs 6, 8–9 View FIGURES 1–10 ). Front face of chelicerae is very rugged, the stridulatory file occupies almost all lateral face ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 17–29 ). Ta with dorsal slit sensilla ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 17–29 ) and dorsal capsulate tarsal organ ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 17–29 ). External genitalia: anterior sclerotization semicircular on anterior dark brown trapezoid pigmentation; posterior sclerotization represented by narrow strip ( Figs 8–9 View FIGURES 1–10 ). Internal genitalia: two oval lateral pore plates heavily sclerotized, a wide uterus externus, a membranous median sac, which is slightly longer than wide, lies dorsally to the uterus ( Figs 10 View FIGURES 1–10 , 18–19 View FIGURES 17–29 ). Measurements: total length 6.4, carapace 2.3 long, 1.4 wide; clypeus height 0.26, chelicerae length 0.56. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.13, PME 0.13, ALE 0.13, AME–ALE 0.9, AME–PME 0.19. Length of legs segments: I 7.8 (2.4, 0.8, 2.1, 1.7, 0.8), II 7.0 (2.1, 0.7, 1.9, 1.6, 0.7), III 5.6 (1.9, 0.6, 1.2, 1.4, 0.5), IV 9.0 (2.9, 0.7, 2.4, 2.5, 0.5).
Variation. Males (n=2) total length 3.9–4.1; carapace 2.0 long, 1.3–1.4 wide; clypeus height 0.2; chelicerae length 0.5–0.6. Length of legs segments: I 10.0–10.4 (3.0–3.1, 0.7–0.8, 3.0, 2.2–2.4, 1.1), II 8.5–9.3 (2.6–2.7, 0.6, 2.5, 2.3–2.4, 0.9-1.0), III 6.5–7.2 (2.1–2.2, 0.5, 1.5–1.8, 1.7–2.0, 0.6–0.7), IV 9.6–10.2 (3.0–3.2, 0.5–0.6, 2.6, 2.9–3.0, 0.6–0.8). Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.09, PME 0.13, ALE 0.13, AME–ALE 0.06–0.09, AME– PME 0.06–0.13 Females (n=11) total length 4.4–6.9, carapace 1.8–3.3 long, 0.8–1.8 wide; clypeus height 0.2– 0.3, chelicerae length 0.6–0.8. Length of legs segments: I 6.6–8.2 (2.3–1.9, 0.5–0.8, 1.7–2.3, 1.4–1.7, 0.7–1.5); II 6.1–8.3 (1.7–2.1, 0.6, 1.8, 1.5, 1.9, 1.6–1.7, 0.7–0.8), III 4.1–5.6 (1.3–1.8, 0.5–0.6, 0.7–1.2, 1.0–1.3, 0.6–0.7), IV 6.8–9.5 (2.1–2.7, 0.5–0.7, 1.8–2.4, 1.8–3.0, 0.6–0.7).AME 0.13–0.16, PME 0.09–0.13, ALE 0.13–0.19. AME–ALE 0.09–0.19, AME–PME 0.13–0.16.
Remarks. Live specimens of D. balandra sp. nov. have bodies covered with white setae, which usually fall off after capture (see Fig. 25 View FIGURES 17–29 ). Diguetia stridulans was described on the basis of a single female from Mejía Island, Baja California (currently deposited at CAS collection). According to Chamberlin (1924: 590–591) and Gertsch (958: 24) this is a distinctive species that readily separated it from other species as mentioned above (diagnosis). Furthermore, the ratio of the first leg to the carapace of D. stridulans is longer than in the other species, and the stridulating file on chelicerae is composed of fine and coarse striae ( Chamberlin 1924, Gertsch 1958). The holotype is in poor condition ( Gertsch 1958: 24) and needs further study, but the characters above allow us to distinguish it from D. balandra sp. nov..
Distribution. Known only from the type locality (See Fig. 109 View FIGURES 109–110 ).
Natural history. Diguetia balandra sp. nov. is found on hills near the seashore ( Fig. 106 View FIGURES 103–108. 103–105 ) where they spin tiny webs between rocks and low vegetation in sarcocaule shrublands ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 17–29 ). Due to the small web, which are built 5 cm above the ground (mean distance) with retreats covered with sandy material, and small corporal size, D. balandra sp. nov. is usually imperceptible ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 17–29 ). The web is characteristic of Diguetia . It has a polyhedron form with four irregular sides and consists of a horizontal silk sheet with irregular tangles of threads above and below the sheet. At the center there is a vertical inverted cone-shaped retreat covered with numerous sand grains adhered with silk, which is closed at the top and open at the bottom. Female retreat size: 13.8–19.4 high and 2.24–6.5 wide at bottom (n=8), males: 12.5–15.5 high and 4.7–5.2 wide at bottom (n=2). This retreat is held up at the top by thick silk threads adhered to the adjacent rocks; the lower side attached to the horizontal silk sheet. The retreat exterior is covered with sandy grains while the interior is covered with a thick layer of silk, which is thicker in females retreat (like a spongy mesh) than males. The lenticular egg sacs (2–4) are sheltered inside and line up from the bottom to the top, and usually placed in one side of the retreat. Males and females rest inside during the day covering the entrance with the opisthosoma.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |