Ceratomyxa pallida Thélohan, 1895
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3887.2.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B697D6BA-836B-44E2-A8D9-07661554FE59 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5626242 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038887C4-FFC1-FFDD-B3BB-FF1583E842C1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ceratomyxa pallida Thélohan, 1895 |
status |
|
Ceratomyxa pallida Thélohan, 1895
Type host: Sarpa salpa Linnaeus, 1758 goldline sea bream ( Perciformes : Sparidae )
Other host: Boops boops Linnaeus, 1758 bogue
Type locality: Mediterranean off Monaco, France.
Other localities: Mediterranean off Tunisia: Location 1: Gulf of Tunis (36°45’N, 10°15’E); Location 2: Bay of Bizerte (37°20’ N, 9°53’ E).
Site of infection: Within gall bladder
Prevalence: The overall prevalence is 20% (66/330) ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ). At location 1, the prevalence of infection is 22.86% (48/210) distributed as following, 03/2012: 13.3% (4/30); 04/2012: 20% (6/30); 05/2012: 30% (9/30); 06/ 2012: 23.3% (7/30); 07/2012: 20% (6/30); 08/2012: 10% (3/30); 05/2013: 40% (8/20); 06/2013: 50% (5/10). At location 2, the prevalence of infection is 15% (18/120) distributed as following, 03/2013: 13.3% (4/30); 04/2013: 13.3% (4/30); 05/2013: 16.7% (5/30); 06/2013: 16.7% (5/30) (see Table 4).
Mean intensity: 126.9 ± 20.8 spores/infected fish (++++++) ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ) (see Table 4).
Type-material: Digitized photos of syntype spores were deposited in the parasitological collection of the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle ( MNHN), Paris, Coll. No. ZS 129.
Description
Vegetative stages. Numerous spherical trophozoïtes found often in massive groups with variety of size ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A). They were seen floating in the bile and contained within several refractile granules and inner generative cells ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A), Monosporic plasmodia (n = 30) ( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 C–D), mostly spherical to amoeboid, measuring 22.9 ± 2.1 (20–25) µm in diameter. The amoeboid plasmodia showed a pseudopodia extending from its periphery ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 C) while other spherical seemed disadvantaged from any type of pseudopodia ( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 C,D)
Spores (n = 30 fresh spores). Mature spores were slightly crescent-shaped with anterior margin convex and posterior slightly concave in sutural view ( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 E–F,H,8B), measuring 7.32 ± 0.61 (6.5–8) µm in length and 28 ± 1.5 (26–30) µm in thickness. Posterior angle was concave to straight 160.9 ± 4.6 (154–170°). Two valves, roughly equal, smoothly ovoid in lateral view tapering gradually toward the end, which one rarely more attenuated than the other. Straight sutural line visible between valves. A binucleate sporoplasm with several visible sporolasmosomes occupied almost the entire spore cavity and rarely dispersed asymmetrically ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 E). Polar capsules were almost spherical, 2.95 ± 0.47 (2.5–3.6) µm in length and 2.92 ± 0.39 (2.5–3.6) µm in width (n = 30). The polar filament formed four turns arranged along the longitudinal axis of the capsule.
Remarks
C. pallida Thélohan, 1895 was firstly described from two members of Sparidae View in CoL family B. boops View in CoL (L.) and S. salpa View in CoL (L.) from the Mediterranean off France. The original description of Thélohan (1895) was poor and limited to some measures. No schematic draw has been published for this species by that author or by Georgévitch (1916) who found the same parasite in the same two hosts from the Mediterranean off Monaco. Auerbach (1912), in his study, was uncertain as the Ceratomyxa species found in the gallbladder of Gadus merlangus (Linnaeus, 1758) View in CoL from the Bergen in Norway, was C. pallida based on dimensions of vegetative forms which were disporous and some mature spores. Likewise, Davis (1917) mentioned in his study a very close similarity between C. monospora Davis, 1917 found in the gall bladders of Peprilus alepidotus (Linnaeus, 1766) View in CoL and Prionotus evolans (Linnaeus, 1766) View in CoL from Atlantic Ocean and C. pallida Thélohan, 1895 based only on the size of the trophozoïtes without determination of the mature spores. In the study of Meglitsch (1960), C. pallida and other species have been omitted from the list of ceratomyxids because of the lack of information. Furthermore, in the synopsis of the Ceratomyxa compiled by Eiras (2006), the description of C. pallida did not conform to the data noted in the original report as the vegetative forms were almost spherical and not the mature spores ( Thélohan 1895; Kudo 1920). During this survey, the trophozoïtes of C. pallida are spherical and monosporous in congruent with the original description of Thélohan (1895). However, the dimensions of the present form show a little difference as the plasmodia are larger and the spores are more longer than those originally noted.
Ecological notes
During our investigation, the overall prevalence of C. pallida infection is 20%. It has a parasitic status as less frequent species (10% ≤ Prevalence ≤ 50%). Infection by C. pallida was present during the entire period of sampling in both localities. In Gulf of Tunis, the infection started from March and increased gradually to June with greater prevalence 20% in 2012 and 50 % in 2013. However, it decreased after from June to August. Generally, prevalence and mean intensity values increased from March to June then diminished till August. In Bay of Bizerte, the infection was detected with no significant difference between months. The highest prevalence was noted in May 16.7% and still constable to June (see Table 4). In both localities, mean intensity of C. pallida appeared severe with 126.9 ± 20.8 spores per infected fish ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ).
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ceratomyxa pallida Thélohan, 1895
Laamiri, Sayef 2014 |
C. monospora
Davis 1917 |
C. pallida Thélohan, 1895
Thelohan 1895 |
C. pallida Thélohan, 1895
Thelohan 1895 |
Peprilus alepidotus
Linnaeus 1766 |
Prionotus evolans
Linnaeus 1766 |
Gadus merlangus
Linnaeus 1758 |