Copidognathus majusculatus (Trouessart, 1894)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.22073/pja.v8i3.49588 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038787FB-874D-FFDD-CA6E-FAB287B7F819 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Copidognathus majusculatus (Trouessart, 1894) |
status |
|
Copidognathus majusculatus (Trouessart, 1894) ( Figs. 9 A–E View Figure 9 )
Material examined Bilem Beach, 9 m, fine sand, 3 ♀♀, 1 ♂.
Morphology and notes
Females 375–380 long, 205–210 wide, that of a male 375 long, 200 wide. AD 137 long, 150 wide. OC 85 long, 20 wide with 2 corneae. PD 225 µm long, 150 wide. AE with three pairs of ventral setae. PE with 1 dorsal and 3 ventral setae. Female AE 150 long, 175 wide. Female GA 137 long, 113 wide; with 22 pgs. Gnathosoma 125 long and 63 wide; 1.9 times longer than wide. Rostrum extending just beyond the level of P-2 ( Fig. 9 D View Figure 9 ). Leg I 265 long. The chaetotaxy of leg I as follows (from trochanter to tarsus); 1, 2, 5, 3, 7, 8 ( Fig. 9 E View Figure 9 ). As mentioned above, C. gibbus resembles C. majusculatus . According to Bartsch (2004b) the main character that distinguish it from its conger is the size of rosetta pores and number of ostia. In C. gibbus ; AD with rosetta pores; each pore large and with ostium surrounded by up to 20 canaliculi. Rosetta pores and ostia small with surrounded by 2–4 canaliculi in C. majusculatus .
Distribution. Mediterranean Sea ( Bartsch 2009).
PD |
Dutch Plant Protection Service, Culture Collection of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.