Masona popeye Quicke & Chaul, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.925.2457 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D01FE9CE-15E5-46ED-A83E-F9A44D829D64 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10805377 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038787DC-FFFB-D354-A471-F95DFDEFBD6E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Masona popeye Quicke & Chaul, 2019 |
status |
|
Masona popeye Quicke & Chaul, 2019
Figs 2A View Fig , 6A View Fig , 7–9 View Fig View Fig View Fig
Masona popeye Quicke & Chaul in Quicke et al., 2019a: 588–592 View Cited Treatment (description, key, distribution, images).
Differential diagnosis
Masona popeye can be easily distinguished from all the other species of the genus by the following morphological features: (1) scutellum present (absent in M. infuscata , M. prognatha , M. similis and M. wow sp.nov.); (2) strong anterior flange of pronotum (absent in M. bulbofemoralis and M. neon sp. nov.); (3) bulbous propodeum (not bulbous in M. bulbofemoralis and M. neon sp. nov.); (4) dorsolateral carina on T1 present (absent in M. bulbofemoralis ).
Original type series
Holotype (by original designation)
BRAZIL • ♀; Minas Gerais, Mata do Paraíso ; 9 Nov. 2016; J. Chaul leg.; CELC.
Male
Unknown.
Distribution
BRAZIL: Mina Gerais ( Quicke et al. 2019a) ( Fig. 9 View Fig ).
Remarks
Known only from the holotype.
CELC |
CELC |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Masona popeye Quicke & Chaul, 2019
Pos, Davide Dal, Broad, Gavin R. & Martens, Abigail P. 2024 |
Masona popeye
Quicke & Chaul 2019 |