Psammostiba Yosii & Sawada, 1976

Gusarov, Vladimir I., 2003, A revision of Nearctic species of the genera Adota Casey, 1910 and Psammostiba Yosii & Sawada, 1976 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae), Zootaxa 185, pp. 1-35 : 20-24

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.156388

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6276785

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038787D8-EF2C-737B-4330-FA56716E1CC6

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Psammostiba Yosii & Sawada, 1976
status

 

Psammostiba Yosii & Sawada, 1976 View in CoL , stat. nov.

( Figs. 53­88 View FIGURES 53 ­ 57 View FIGURES 58 ­ 61 View FIGURES 62 ­ 64 View FIGURES 65 ­ 68 View FIGURES 73 ­ 77 View FIGURES 78 ­ 81 View FIGURES 82 ­ 87 View FIGURE 88 )

Atheta (Panalota) View in CoL : Brundin, 1943: 19, ex parte.

Atheta View in CoL ( Psammostiba Yosii & Sawada, 1976 View in CoL ): 82 (type species: Homalota hilleri Weise, 1877 View in CoL , by original designation).

Diagnosis. Psammostiba can be distinguished from the other athetine genera by the combination of the following characters: body parallel­sided; anterior margin of labrum concave; antennal articles 5­10 slightly elongate or subquadrate ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 62 ­ 64 ); ligula long and split in apical half ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 58 ­ 61 ); labial palpus with setae and present ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 58 ­ 61 ); pronotum slightly transverse, 1.1 times as wide as long, with microsetae directed anteriorly along the midline; in lateral portions of the disc microsetae directed laterally (Type I, Benick & Lohse 1974) ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 62 ­ 64 ); pronotal macrosetae short; pronotal hypomera fully visible in lateral view; medial macroseta of mesotibia inconspicuous and thin, as long as tibial width; tarsal formula 4­5­5; metatarsal segment 1 as long as segment 2 ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 65 ­ 68 ); no empodial setae (best observed in lateral view; Fig. 65 View FIGURES 65 ­ 68 ); tarsal claws of different length (best observed in dorsal view; Fig. 66 View FIGURES 65 ­ 68 ), external claw longer than internal; copulatory piece without pointed apex ( Figs. 67­68 View FIGURES 65 ­ 68 ); proximal portion of spermatheca with one coil ( Figs. 77 View FIGURES 73 ­ 77 , 87 View FIGURES 82 ­ 87 ).

Psammostiba can be distinguished from Atheta by strong isodiametric microsculpture of the entire body; by the concave anterior margin of the labrum; by basal impression on the tergum 6; by lacking empodial seta and by tarsal claws of different length.

Psammostiba differs from Adota in having antennal article 3 longer than article 2 ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 62 ­ 64 ); larger body; tarsal claws of different length; and in lacking the empodial seta. Description. Length 3.0­5.0 mm, pronotal width 0.59­0.89 mm. Body black with brown legs and light brown tarsi.

Head 1.1 times as wide as long; eyes large, temple length to eye length ratio 0.9­1.1; infraorbital carina incomplete, reaching middle of eye or very short. Antennal article 3 slightly longer than article 2, articles 4­10 slightly elongate or subquadrate, terminal article without coeloconic sensilla, shorter or as long as articles 9 and 10 combined ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 62 ­ 64 ). Labrum ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 58 ­ 61 ) transverse, with concave anterior margin. Adoral surface of labrum (epipharynx) as in Fig. 54 View FIGURES 53 ­ 57 . Mandibles ( Figs. 55­57 View FIGURES 53 ­ 57 ) broad, right mandible with a small medial tooth; dorsal molar area with velvety patch consisting of very small denticles (invisible at 400x). Maxilla ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 58 ­ 61 ) with galea projecting slightly beyond apex of lacinia; apical lobe of galea covered with numerous fine and short setae; internal margin of galea with long subapical setae; apical 1/3 of lacinia with row of closely spaced spines, middle portion produced medially and covered with numerous setae ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 58 ­ 61 ). Labium as in Figs. 58­59, 61 View FIGURES 58 ­ 61 ; ligula long and split in apical half; medial area of prementum with 2 pores and with 18­30 pseudopores, lateral areas each with two asetose pores, single setose pore and 18­33 pseudopores ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 58 ­ 61 ). Hypopharyngeal lobes as in Fig. 59 View FIGURES 58 ­ 61 . Labial palpus with setae and present ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 58 ­ 61 ). Mentum ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 58 ­ 61 ) with concave anterior margin.

Pronotum slightly transverse, 1.2 times as wide as long, with microsetae directed anteriorly in midline; in lateral portions of disc microsetae directed laterally (Type I, Benick & Lohse 1974) ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 62 ­ 64 ); macrosetae short; hypomera fully visible in lateral view. Meso­ and metasternum as in Fig. 63 View FIGURES 62 ­ 64 , mesosternal process narrow, extending about 4/7 length of mesocoxal cavities, metasternal process short, mesosternum and mesosternal process not carinate medially; relative lengths of mesosternal process: isthmus: metasternal process in ratio of about 4:1:2; mesocoxal cavities margined posteriorly; mesocoxae narrowly separated. Medial macroseta of mesotibia inconspicuous, shorter than tibial width. Tarsal segmentation 4­5­5, metatarsal segment 1 as long as segment 2 ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 65 ­ 68 ). No empodial setae (best observed in lateral view; Fig. 65 View FIGURES 65 ­ 68 ); tarsal claws of different length (best observed in dorsal view; Fig. 66 View FIGURES 65 ­ 68 ), external claw longer than internal. Posterior margin of elytra straight. Wings fully developed.

Abdominal terga 3­6 with moderate basal impression. Tergum 7 as long as tergum 6. Punctation on terga 6­7 almost as dense as on terga 3­5. Tergum 7 with wide white palisade fringe.

Internal sac of aedeagus with a medial pair of partially sclerotized structures ( Figs. 67­ 68 View FIGURES 65 ­ 68 ; SS) which may be homologous to medial lamellae present in many genera of Athetini. Copulatory piece without pointed apex ( Figs. 67­68 View FIGURES 65 ­ 68 ); proximal portion of spermatheca with a single coil ( Figs. 77 View FIGURES 73 ­ 77 , 87 View FIGURES 82 ­ 87 ).

Type species. Homalota hilleri Weise, 1877 , by original designation.

Discussion. Although originally proposed as a subgenus of Atheta , Psammostiba differs from Atheta in many characters (see Diagnosis) and it is considered here as a distinct genus of the tribe Athetini.

Yosii & Sawada (1976) state that in P. hilleri and P. jessoensis the "claws of all legs are variable in length and strength". In all twenty specimens of P. jessoensis examined by me the external claws were significantly longer than the internal ones.

Psammostiba View in CoL seems to be restricted to the coasts of the Northern Pacific. Psammostiba comparabilis View in CoL (Mäklin in Mannerheim, 1853) and P. kenaii Gusarov View in CoL , sp. n. are the only known Nearctic species of this genus. Psammostiba View in CoL includes three additional Palaearctic species distributed in the Far East: P. hilleri ( Weise, 1877) View in CoL , P. jessoensis ( Brundin, 1943) View in CoL and P. kamtschatica ( Brundin, 1943) View in CoL .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Staphylinidae

SubFamily

Aleocharinae

Loc

Psammostiba Yosii & Sawada, 1976

Gusarov, Vladimir I. 2003
2003
Loc

Atheta (Panalota)

Brundin 1943: 19
1943
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF