Triaeris stenaspis Simon, 1892
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5297.2.8 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:62A6A2FC-E095-4D24-A99B-F293CD02F61C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7999883 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038787BC-F438-7300-5988-F98A5AD9DD36 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Triaeris stenaspis Simon, 1892 |
status |
|
Triaeris stenaspis Simon, 1892 View in CoL View at ENA ( Figs 1–9 View FIGURES 1–9 )
Triaeris stenaspis Simon, 1892: 561 View in CoL .
Triaeris patellaris Bryant, 1940: 268 View in CoL , fig. 4.
Triaeris berlandi Lawrence, 1952: 5 View in CoL , figs. 3a–f.
Triaeris lepus Suman, 1965: 235 View in CoL , figs. 27–31.
Triaeris lacandona Brignoli, 1974: 208 View in CoL , figs. 4A–F.
Oonops erinaceus Benoit, 1977: 31 View in CoL , figs. 11a–d. syn. nov.
For complete synonymy list, see World Spider Catalog (2023)
Type material examined. Holotype ♀ Oonops erinaceus ( BE _ RMCA _ ARA.Ara.133326 ), Flagstaff hill, Saint Helena, 2000–2200m, 7.V.1967, J. Decelle and N. Leleup coll.; GoogleMaps paratype imm. ♀ Oonops erinaceus ( BE _ RMCA _ ARA.Ara.133347 ), Prosperous Bay Plain, Saint Helena, 15°57’S, 05°39’W, 1000–1100ft, 5–6.V.1967, J. Decelle & N. Leleup coll. GoogleMaps
Other material examined. 1 ♀ ( IBSP 61400 View Materials ), Brazil: Reservatório Guarapiranga , Jardim Ângela, Ilha dos Eucaliptos (23°45’9.5286”S - 46°44’23.3082”W), 07-13.X.2003, I. Cizauskas & C. R. M. Garcia coll. GoogleMaps
Diagnosis. See Platnick et al. (2012).
Description. For a detailed description, see Platnick et al. (2012).
Remarks. Simon (1892) described Triaeris stenaspis based on a female from Saint Vincent Island, and this now pantropical and introduced species has never had a male documented. Thus, it is likely this species is wholly parthenogenic ( Brescovit et al., 2019). The long seta on the chelicera and the female genitalia ( Figs 8–9 View FIGURES 1–9 ) illustrated in the original description of Oonops erinaceus by Benoit (1977) are typical of T. stenaspis material from multiple continents examined by DS, ADB, AH and RJ (pers. obs.). Indeed, the epigyne of the holotype, with distinctive morphology of the receptacle, is almost indistinguishable from specimens from other regions (cf. Figs 6, 7 View FIGURES 1–9 ) and differences in the habitus to fresh specimens are simply the result of long-term preservation in ethanol ( Figs 1–5 View FIGURES 1–9 ). Although the type specimen of O. erinaceus is almost completely bleached and appears at first to lack scuta, we can still faintly observe the border of the dorsal scutum ( Figs 2, 4 View FIGURES 1–9 ). Therefore, we propose, based on near-identical cheliceral setae and epigynal morphology, that O. erinaceus be considered a junior synonym of T. stenaspis syn. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Triaeris stenaspis Simon, 1892
Sherwood, Danniella, Brescovit, Antonio D., Henrard, Arnaud, Jocqué, Rudy & Fowler, Liza 2023 |
Oonops erinaceus
Benoit, P. L. G. 1977: 31 |
Triaeris lacandona
Brignoli, P. M. 1974: 208 |
Triaeris lepus
Suman, T. W. 1965: 235 |
Triaeris berlandi
Lawrence, R. F. 1952: 5 |
Triaeris patellaris
Bryant, E. B. 1940: 268 |
Triaeris stenaspis
Simon, E. 1892: 561 |