Miltochrista qingchenga, Volynkin & Černý & Huang & Saldaitis, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37828/em.2023.68.3 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:056C13E9-C85C-4803-B27D-AD181809DD13 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13247737 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F59954F7-CDD0-4BB3-AE7E-2E6F1D8037C4 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:F59954F7-CDD0-4BB3-AE7E-2E6F1D8037C4 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Miltochrista qingchenga |
status |
sp. nov. |
Miltochrista qingchenga View in CoL sp. n.
https://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:F59954F7-CDD0-4BB3-AE7E-2E6F1D8037C4
( Figs 25, 26 View Figures 16–26 , 65 View Figures 62–65 , 89 View Figures 86–89 )
Type material. Holotype ( Figs 25 View Figures 16–26 , 65 View Figures 62–65 ): male, “ China, Sichuan-prov. | Mt. Qingchengshan | 10.–21. Juli 2006 ” / “ Museum Witt ” / “ Slide | ZSM Arct. | 423/2017 ♂ | A. Volynkin ” ( MWM / ZSM).
Paratype. CHINA: female, the same data as in the holotype, gen. prep. No.: ZSM Arct. 424/2017 ♂ ( MWM / ZSM) .
Diagnosis. The forewing length is 12.0 mm in the male holotype and 13.0 mm in the female paratype. Miltochrista qingchenga sp. n. ( Figs 25, 26 View Figures 16–26 ) is externally similar to M. conthytera sp. n. ( Figs 20, 21 View Figures 16–26 ) and M. ehyrosta sp. n. ( Figs 16–19 View Figures 16–26 ) but distinguished by the somewhat larger size, the slightly paler forewing ground colour, and the more medially sinuous medial line. The male genital capsule of the new species ( Fig. 65 View Figures 62–65 ) is similar to the externally dissimilar M. cingula ( Fig. 66 View Figures 66–69 ) but in the latter the uncus is shorter and broader, and the valva is less dilated distally and has a narrower distal saccular process. The phallus of M. qingchenga sp. n. is shorter (in proportion to the tegumen-vinculum complex) and narrower than in M. cingula . Compared to M. cingula , the vesica of the new species has a longer proximal section, a narrower main chamber, a shorter and narrower distal cornutus, and bears two lateral cornuti whereas M. cingula , as well as most other related species, has a single lateral cornutus. The female genitalia of the two species are very similar but unlike M. cingula ( Fig. 90 View Figures 90–93 ), in M. qingchenga sp. n. ( Fig. 89 View Figures 86–89 ) the medial ventral depression of the ostium bursae margin is broader and rather V-shaped (it has parallel lateral margins in M. cingula ), the posterior sclerotised clusters of the corpus bursae consist of longer spinules, and the medial lateral gelatinous diverticulum of the corpus bursae is well-developed (similar to M. conthytera sp. n. and M. ehyrosta sp. n.).
Distribution. China (Sichuan Province).
Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from the type locality. The name is a noun in the nominative singular in apposition to the generic name.
ZSM |
Bavarian State Collection of Zoology |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.