Praearmantomys crusafonti de Bruijn, 1966
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/g2012n3a10 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0383D54C-FFCF-6D3B-AA12-EA2FFB7BFA0E |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Praearmantomys crusafonti de Bruijn, 1966 |
status |
|
cf. Praearmantomys crusafonti de Bruijn, 1966 ( Fig. 4S View FIG )
HOLOTYPE. — Ateca 1, fragment mandible and maxila with incomplete dentition (Nr. 72, 73, 74 and 75; de Bruijn 1966: pl. I; figs 1-4).
TYPE LOCALITY. — Ateca 1, Ebro Basin, Spain.
LOCALITY AND AGE. — Cabezo Carboneras 1 ( CC 1), Province of Navarre, Spain. Agenian (Local subzone Y2, MN 2).
MATERIAL AND MEASUREMENTS (L × W). — CC 1-22 (13.92 × 14.31), right m3.
DESCRIPTION
m3
Posterolingual side very reduced with a subtriangular shape.Anterolophid separated from the protoconid by a deep furrow. Metalophid connected to metaconid. Centrolophid absent.Mesolophid transverse and connected to the labial end of the posterolophid. Mesolophid and posterolophid separated at the entoconid.
In CC1 a m3 of large size has been recovered. Its size and above all its hypsodonty are very similar to Praearmantomys . The ridges are vertical. The size is larger than A. bijmai and A. daamsi and similar to the populations of A. parsani . The hypsodonty is very different from these latter species.
The shape of this molar is characterized by the strong reduction of posterolingual side. This morphology has been cited in populations of P. crusafonti ( Daams 1990) and seems to be characteristic of this genus.
For the mesolophid of m3 of P. crusafonti from Cabeza Rubia two morphotypes have been figured ( Daams 1990). The first (2 out of 3 specimens), with a transverse mesolophid not connected to the posterolophid and the second with a mesolophid connected to the posterolophid forming a Y-shape. In the rest of the populations of P. crusafonti the first morphotype is very poorly represented.In the m3 from CC1 the mesolophid is transverse and connected to the posterolophid on the labial side of the tooth.The mesolophid from CC1 is similar but not identical to the first morphotype described by Daams, because the mesolophid is connected on the labial border.
The fossil record of P.crusafonti ranges from uppermost Agenian to Lower Aragonian ( Fig.3 View FIG ). In Cabeza Rubia (Upper Agenian,zone Y2) P.crusafonti has been cited together with A. parsani ( Daams 1990) .Cabezo Carboneras 1 (CC1) contains an unknown glirid association of P.crusafonti with A. daamsi . This implies an older age for CC1 and may explain the presence of a morphotype that is not known in Cabeza Rubia. The material is too poor to draw solid conclusions.
CC |
CSIRO Canberra Rhizobium Collection |
MN |
Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |