Symplana major Fennah, 1963
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.17109/AZH.68.1.23.2022 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0383B529-485D-6206-0FFA-43A9C11F7B12 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Symplana major Fennah, 1963 |
status |
|
Symplana major Fennah, 1963 View in CoL
( Figs 6–10 View Figs 6–10 , 34 View Figs 28–35 )
Symplana major Fennah, 1963: 726 View in CoL , Fig. 2 a–e View Figs 1–5 .
Supplementary description. Female genitalia. Hind margin of sternite VII sharply concave medially, fused endogonocoxal lobes wide, rounded apically ( Fig. 34 View Figs 28–35 ).
Total length: 11.5 mm.
Type material examined. Holotype, f “ Ayur , / North Salem. / F. R. I. Sandal / Insect Survey / 23.X.30 [print and hand written]” // “Pres. by / Imp. Inst. Ent. / Brit. Mus. / 1932 356. [print]” // “508 [hand written]” // “Plot 21 [print]” // “ Symplana / major Fennah / det / RG Fennah Type [print and hand written]” // “Holo / type [circle, print]” ( BMNH).
ventral view (scale bar: 1 mm); 5 = labels ventral view (scale bar: 1 mm); 10 = labels
Note. The species was collected from unspiked sandal ( FENNAH 1963). In the original description FENNAH (1963) indicated male as the holotype, however, the female from Ayur is marked as the holotype in the collection of the Natural History Museum in London ( Figs 6–10 View Figs 6–10 ), which I accept here as the holotype.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Symplana major Fennah, 1963
Gnezdilov, Vladimir M. 2022 |
Symplana major
FENNAH, R. G. 1963: 726 |