Pneumia fuehzulii, Oboňa, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.823.1813 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:69BA2C5F-AC2D-471B-AA38-DC11D3A04BE1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6629362 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/07B400D8-6775-4C2E-8B0B-E2BB2D7D4818 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:07B400D8-6775-4C2E-8B0B-E2BB2D7D4818 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pneumia fuehzulii |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pneumia fuehzulii View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:07B400D8-6775-4C2E-8B0B-E2BB2D7D4818
Figs 1–20 View Figs 1–8 View Figs 9–20
Differential diagnosis
Pneumia fuehzulii sp. nov. resembles P. canescens (Meigen, 1804) in body size, as well as wings, and less distinctly visible characters, such as the shape of aedeagal complex. It clearly differs by stronger CuA 2 ( Fig. 13 View Figs 9–20 ), M 3, CuA 1 and CuA 2 not touched basally. Hypandrium with two swellings in the middle and a deep cleft between them ( Figs 8 View Figs 1–8 , 16 View Figs 9–20 ). Gonostyli almost straight ( Figs 8 View Figs 1–8 , 17–18 View Figs 9–20 ), distiphallus straight, pointed, extending a little beyond the parameres (dorsal view). Parameres sickle-shaped ( Figs 19–20 View Figs 9–20 ). Apertures of the epandrium small, circular. Remainders of ventral epandrial plate V-shaped, conspicuous ( Figs 7 View Figs 1–8 , 15 View Figs 9–20 ). Pneumia canescens is readily distinguishable by CuA 2 not strengthened ( Jung 1956: 235, fig. 128). M 3, CuA 1 and CuA 2 touched basally. Hypandrium broader in the middle ( Jung 1956: 235, fig. 130; Vaillant 1979: tab. lxxxiv, fig. 9). Gonostyli bent (Vaillant 1979: tab. lxxxiv, fig. 9), distiphallus straight, pointed, as long as the parameres, not sickle-shaped. Basal two apertures of epandrium conspicuous (Vaillant 1979: tab. lxxxiv, fig. 9). Remainders of ventral epandrial plate not detected.
Etymology
This species is named in honour of the famous medieval Turkish-Azerbaijan poet Məhəmməd Süleyman oğlu Füzuli.
Material examined
Holotype AZERBAIJAN • 1 ♂; Qəbələ district, Durca ; 41.037750° N, 47.886583° E; 1310 m a.s.l.; 9 May 2019; J. Oboňa et al. leg.; Loc. AZE 28; sweep netting, forest edge and brook; slide with a dissected specimen, Cat. No. 34949, Inv. No. 26006; NMPC. GoogleMaps
Paratypes AZERBAIJAN • 3 ♂♂; same collection data as for holotype; slide, some specimens dissected, Cat. No. 34950 to 34952 , Inv. No. 26007 to 26009 ; NMPC GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Balakən distr., Balakən, Mahamalar ; 41.7370700° N, 46.4372111° E; 465 m a.s.l.; 9 May 2019; J. Oboňa et al. leg.; Loc. AZE 25; sweep netting, open small brook (clay, micro-, mesolithal) and marsh, pasture/forest; slide, Cat. No. 34953 , Inv. No. 26010 ; NMPC GoogleMaps .
Description
Male
HEAD. As long as broad ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–8 ); vertex conically inflated with numerous setae, alveoli almost irregularly spaced over its entire surface, with 3–4 supraocular bristles on dorsal margins of eyes on extreme lateral sides of head. Horizontal border of setae above the upper apices of the eyes developed, slightly convex in the middle. Eyes separated ( Figs 1 View Figs 1–8 , 9 View Figs 9–20 ); interocular suture conspicuously sclerotized, inverted V-shaped, sclerotized parts gradually tapering from eyes to median, not fused medially, connected by thin ligament. Eye bridge with 5 facet rows ( Fig. 9 View Figs 9–20 ), divided by the approximate width of 4 facet diameters. Ratio of distance of apices of eyes (tangential points) to minimum width of frons approximately 3.5:1. Frontoclypeus ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–8 ) with a large almost oval central patch of irregular insertions of setae with narrow medial lobe prolonged to interocular suture. Antennae with scape, pedicel and 14-segmented flagellum ( Figs 2 View Figs 1–8 , 10 View Figs 9–20 ) haired. Sensory filaments (ascoids) not observed. Scape a little prolonged, barrel-shaped, 1.2 times as long as ovoid pedicel. Both parts with many narrow scales (for size, see Fig. 2 View Figs 1–8 ). First flagellomere cylindrical (1.1 times as short as pedicel), medial flagellomeres decreasing in size, spindleshaped. Apical progressively bulbous, with a globular apiculus (digit), excentric, 2.1 times as short as the bases bearing them. Mouthparts hardly extend beyond basal palp segments. Length ratios of palpus segments 1.0:1.0:1.2:1.8; last palp segment annulate ( Fig. 3 View Figs 1–8 ). For the terminal lobes of labium, as shown in Fig. 4 View Figs 1–8 , lines of spines between both lobes are developed, tongue protuberances in between distally are inconspicuous. Cibarium proximally with a pair of conspicuous bent sclerotized arms, ratio of maximum length of cibarium to length of epipharynx 2.4:1 ( Fig. 11 View Figs 9–20 ), labrum pointed.
THORAX. Anepisternum setae patch almost semicircular between spiracle and wing insertion ( Fig. 5 View Figs 1–8 ). Spiracles set high on mesothorax. No thoracic allurement organs, anepimeron with triangular setose patch. Wings ( Fig. 13 View Figs 9–20 ) ovoid, 3.3 mm long in holotype, 3.0– 3.1 mm in paratypes, rounded distally, inconspicuously expanded at posterior margin. Membrane of wing generally clear; however, sometimes distal part of cell, fork areas, ends of all veins excl. Sc and middle part of CuA 2 clouded. Strengthened parts of veins: Sc, R 1 (not the start), R 2+3, basal cell, R 5, whole CuA 2 and almost all wing veins distally. Radial and medial forks arise at the same level, both forks conspicuously in a basal position to end of CuA 2. R5 ends slightly beyond wing apex. Bases of M 3, CuA 1 and CuA 2 are not connected. Wing index (wing length to width) 2.5. Halteres ( Fig. 12 View Figs 9–20 ) stick-shaped, symmetrical in longitudinal axis, bent and haired, with mass of sensory scales subapically. Ratio of maximum length of halteres to their maximum width 2.7:1. Length ratios of femora, tibiae and first tarsomeres: P 1 2.1:2.3:1.0, P 2 2.3:2.8:1.1, P 3 2.7:3.5:1.2. Paired tarsal claws of P 1 conspicuously backward hooked ( Fig. 6 View Figs 1–8 ) with ventral teeth.
MALE GENITALIA. Basiphallus of the male aedeagal complex ( Figs 8 View Figs 1–8 , 19–20 View Figs 9–20 ) straight from dorsal view (incl. some small differences – Fig. 19 View Figs 9–20 ), proximally spoon-shaped, triangular, narrowed and edging distally ( Figs 8 View Figs 1–8 , 19 View Figs 9–20 ), with longitudinal rib proximally, a little arched in lateral view ( Fig. 20 View Figs 9–20 ). Spatula modified from two broad rectangular bases to a parallel inner deep cleft ( Figs 8 View Figs 1–8 , 19 View Figs 9–20 ). Distiphallus straight, pointed, bent dorsally in lateral view ( Fig. 20 View Figs 9–20 ), extending a little beyond the parameres (however, distiphallus sometimes two times longer – see paratype Cat. No. 34953 and Inv. No. 26010 from AZE Loc. 25). Parameres sickle-shaped ( Figs 19–20 View Figs 9–20 ). Ratio of length of gonocoxites to length of aedeagal complex (incl. basiphallus) 1:1.9. Gonocoxites cylindrical ( Figs 8 View Figs 1–8 , 17 View Figs 9–20 ), approximately as long as the gonostyli from dorsal view. Gonostyli with circular base, almost straight, waving subapically ( Fig. 18 View Figs 9–20 ), pointed. Epandrium ( Figs 7 View Figs 1–8 , 14 View Figs 9–20 ) approximately quadrilateral, caudal half with numerous setae on both sides. Basal two apertures circular, divided, conspicuously bordered by sclerotized folds. Remainders of ventral epandrial plate V-shaped ( Figs 7 View Figs 1–8 , 15 View Figs 9–20 ), sclerotized laterally on both sides, with an approximately oval soft part inside, distally with two conspicuous external protrudent corners and near base of the epipropct with two miniature ones. Hypandrium narrow in connection with epandrium; however, the former broad, bar-shaped, with two swellings in the middle and a deep cleft between them ( Figs 8 View Figs 1–8 , 16 View Figs 9–20 ). Epiproct relatively small, with an almost semicircular caudal ending or fold, covered with short microsetae ( Figs 7 View Figs 1–8 , 14–15 View Figs 9–20 ). Hypoproct large, triangular or tongue-shaped, 0.4 times as long as the epandrial appendages, haired caudally ( Figs 7 View Figs 1–8 , 14–15 View Figs 9–20 ). Epandrial appendages ( Figs 7 View Figs 1–8 , 14 View Figs 9–20 ) about 1.8 times as long as the epandrium, curved slightly in the middle, and tenacula (numbers 9–12 are stable) restricted to clusters near the rounded apex, gradually becoming shorter towards top of epandrial appendages. Tenacula endings not fringed.
Female
Unknown.
Bionomics
Unknown. Adults (males) were collected in montane or hilly habitats, specifically swampy areas of pasture or forest brooks.
Distribution
Currently recorded only from Azerbaijan.
NMPC |
National Museum Prague |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |