Mastogloia quinquecostata Grunow
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.12117576 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12576003 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03826143-FF9C-8171-FF34-F9221744FF43 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Mastogloia quinquecostata Grunow |
status |
|
Mastogloia quinquecostata Grunow Figs 73–79 View Figures 72–86
Section Sulcatae .
Ref. illus.: Peragallo & Peragallo 1897 –1908, pl. 6, fig. 3; Hustedt 1931 –1959, fig. 989; Ricard 1974, p. 3(21), fig. 7; Ricard 1975, figs 32–35; Paddock & Kemp 1990, fig. 20c; Witkowski et al. 2000, pl. 80, figs 7, 8
Samples: GU44I-2, GU44K-6, GU52Q-10a, GU66A-5, GU66F-8
Dimensions: Length 30–58 µm, width 14–19 µm; striae 22–24 in 10 µm
Diagnostics: Elliptical-lanceolate to rhombic-lanceolate valves with strong longitudinal lines and narrow partectal rings with square to apically rectangular partecta. Outer raphe is strongly sinuous and the inner straight; central endings straight.
Comments: The species name refers to the strong longitudinal lines, which mark the borders of the pseudoconopeum; a thin dark line marking the joint in the pseudoconopeum can sometimes be seen in LM and is clear in SEM ( Figs 77, 78 View Figures 72–86 , arrows). Our stria densities are higher than those in Peragallo & Peragallo (1897 –1908) (15–16 in 10 µm) and Hustedt (1931 –1959) (16–20 in 10 µm). Montgomery (1978, pl. 138, figs A–E, pl. 139, figs C, D) has exterior SEMs labeled as M. quinquecostata , but they all show specimens with true conopea, open along the side, in contrast to Paddock & Kemp’s (1990) illustration. The partecta shown in Witkowski et al. (2000) do not match those in Hustedt’s (1931 –1956) drawings.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |