Mastogloia seychellensis Grunow, 1878
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.12117576 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12576007 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03826143-FF93-8171-FF34-FD381524F820 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Mastogloia seychellensis Grunow |
status |
|
Mastogloia seychellensis Grunow Figs 80–82 View Figures 72–86
Section Paradoxae
Ref. illus.: Hustedt 1931 –1959, fig. 958; Loir & Novarino 2013, pl. 21c
Samples: GU52Q-10a
Dimensions: Length 45–48 µm, width 13 µm; transapical striae 27 in 10 µm, longitudinal striae 26 in 10 µm.
Diagnostics: Elliptical-lanceolate valves with rostrate apices, the partecta strongly displaced toward the midline and with evident ducts leading obliquely to the valvocopula wall.
Comments: M. seychellensis is similar to M. paradoxa Grunow ( Hustedt 1931 –1959, fig. 953; in our flora: Lobban et al. 2012, pl. 34, figs 3–5) and M. similis Hustedt ( Hustedt 1931 –1959, fig. 954); the latter differs from M. paradoxa only in having a straight raphe. In these taxa the middle chambers are distinctly larger than the rest, instead of forming a graded series as in M. seychellensis , and both have axial costae along the raphe, which are absent from M. seychellensis . The size ranges of M. seychellensis and M. paradoxa are respectively 30–50 µm and 50–60 µm according to Hustedt. Although Hustedt showed the raphe of M. seychellensis as perfectly straight, the Guam specimens have a distinctly wavy raphe. On the strength of the difference Hustedt (1931 –1959) used to erect M. similis , this would be enough to exclude these specimens from M. seychellensis but we do not yet have adequate material to address the differences among these species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |