Petroneis humerosa (Brébisson ex W. Smith) Stickle & D.G. Mann
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.12117576 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12576015 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03826143-FF92-8170-FF34-FB5A17B5FBAB |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Petroneis humerosa (Brébisson ex W. Smith) Stickle & D.G. Mann |
status |
|
Petroneis humerosa (Brébisson ex W. Smith) Stickle & D.G. Mann Figs 95–97 View Figures 87–97
Ref. illus.: Peragallo & Peragallo 1897 –1908, pl. 27, fig. 20; Hustedt 1961 –1966, fig. 1702 (both as Navicula humerosa ); Witkowski et al. 2000, pl. 101, figs 2, 3, pl. 102, fig. 3
Samples: GU44I-3
Dimensions: Length 45–60 µm, width 29–34 µm; striae 12 in 10 µm
Diagnostics: Valves broad, linear, slightly rostrate. Strongly radiating striae with coarse areolae; short striae interspersed between longer ones along the central linear part of the valve.
Comments: Similar to P. latissima Gregory and P. monilifera Cleve ( Hustedt 1961 –1966, figs 1701, 1699), but those have coarser striae. There are a number of small ultrastructural differences between Petroneis and Cosmioneis which together warranted their separation ( Round et al. 1990: 526); SEMs from a sample in the Davis collection from Saipan, CNMI ( Figs 96, 97 View Figures 87–97 ), show the internal central raphe endings to be crozier- rather than anchor-shaped, suggesting that the Guam specimen is also Petroneis . However, C. delawariensis (Grunow ex Cleve) D.G. Mann ( Witkowski et al. 2000, pl. 106, figs 1, 2) is very similar in LM.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |