Aspidiotinae (Diaspididae)

Smith-Pardo, Allan H., Evans, Gregory A. & Dooley, John W., 2012, A review of the genus Chrysomphalus Ashmead (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Diaspididae) with descriptions of a new species and a new, related genus, Zootaxa 3570, pp. 1-24 : 3-4

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.282977

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:68A889B1-51C1-40B2-A264-DE8AE782B94C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6179502

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0382231A-FFC2-FFB9-1398-FA92FA78FDE2

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Aspidiotinae (Diaspididae)
status

 

Key to the Aspidiotinae (Diaspididae) genera similar to the genus Chrysomphalus

1a. Paraphyses arising only from basal angles of lobes, not from an interlobular space, sometimes with a weak sclerotization close to paraphysis at basal angle of lobe............................................................... 2

1b. Paraphyses arising from basal angles of lobes and at least one interlobular space, usually located more or less halfway between lobes..................................................................................... 5

2a (1a). Anal opening large, space between opening and posterior margin of pygidium not more than 2x diameter of opening; L2 and L3 usually reduced to small points; paraphyses wide and robust; plates usually with fringed apices........................................................................................ Hemiberlesia Cockerell, 1897 View in CoL

2b. Anal opening small, space between opening and posterior margin of pygidium more than 2x diameter of opening; L2 and often L3 well developed; paraphyses slender; plates variable................................................ 3

3a (2b). L2 and L3 well developed; plates usually well developed and with fringed apices..... Abgrallaspis Balachowsky, 1948 View in CoL

3b. L3 not developed; L2 developed but often only as small points; plates usually short, and spine-like, without fringed apices................................................................................................. 4

4a (3b). Paraphyses arising from lateral angle of L1 typically elongate, slender and terminating in a heavily sclerotized knob.............................................................................. Clavaspis MacGillivray, 1921 View in CoL

4b. Paraphyses arising from lateral angle of L1 not terminating in a heavily sclerotized knob.. Diaspidiotus Cockerell, 1897 View in CoL

5a (1b). Lateral margin of pygidium entirely without plates or gland spines; paraphyses absent anterior to L3.............................................................................................. Targionia Signoret, 1869 View in CoL

5b. Lateral margin of pygidium with at least a few plates or gland spines; paraphyses present or absent anterior to L3..... 6

6a (5b). Pygidium with 5 plates between L1 and L2; L2 larger than L1 with many short teeth and L2 closer to L3 than to L1; 2 paraphyses present between L1 and L2................................................ Pentalaminaspis nov. gen.

6b. Pygidium with fewer than 4 plates or gland spines between L1 and L2; L2 not larger than L1, and L2 located closer to L1 than to L3; with 0 or 1 paraphyses present between L1 and L2.............................................. 7

7a (6b). Pygidial margin anterior to L4 not heavily sclerotized, without a series of short paraphyses; plates anterior to L3 conspicuous, branched, fringed or clubbed, their length usually exceeding that of lobes; anus usually located closer to posterior margin than to vulva................................................................................ 8

7b. Pygidial margin anterior to L4 heavily sclerotized, often with a series of short paraphyses; plates anterior to L3 not as long and conspicuous, and may be branched, fringed or spine-like, their length usually not exceeding that of lobes; anus usually in middle or closer to vulva than posterior margin....................................................... 10

8a (7a). Paraphyses absent or, if present, poorly developed, short, not exceeding length of lobes; paraphyses in L2–L3 interlobular space absent or not pronounced....................................... Dynaspidiotus Thiem & Gerneck, 1934 View in CoL

8b. Paraphyses well-developed, long and slender, each as long as, or exceeding, length of lobes; paraphyses in L2–L3 interlobular space well-developed, long and slender............................................................. 9

9a (8b). Prosoma of mature female strongly sclerotized, reniform shaped with lateral lobes more or less enclosing pygidium in most species; paraphyses relatively short, about as long as lobes in most species.. Aonidiella Berlese & Leonardi, 1896 View in CoL

9b. Prosoma of mature female, if strongly sclerotized, not reniform in shape and with lateral lobes not enclosing pygidium; paraphyses relatively long, much longer than lobes in most species.................. Chrysomphalus Ashmead, 1880 View in CoL

10a (7b). Pygidium broad at the base, elongate and tapering apically to a point, lateral margins tending to be slightly concave; with 3 pairs of pygidial lobes; L4 reduced to a point or absent; margin anterior to L4 heavily sclerotized; and with or without an extended series of well-developed, quite long, closely set paraphyses; often with most or all paraphyses between L1 and L4 similar in length................................................................................. 11

10b. Pygidium usually short and broad, not tapering apically to an acute point, lateral margins tending to be convex; usually with 4 or 5 pairs of pygidial lobes; L4 usually well developed;; margin anterior to L4 lightly to heavily sclerotized, paraphyses anterior to L4 absent, weakly developed or rather few; often with most or all paraphyses between L1 and L4 variable in length................................................................................... 13

11a (10a). Pygidium with 4 or more pairs of well-developed pygidial lobes; margin anterior to L4 without distinct paraphyses; plates between lobes long, distinctly longer than length of lobes................................ Marginaspis Hall, 1946 View in CoL

11b. Pygidium with 3 pairs of pygidial lobes; margin anterior to L4 with paraphyses; plates between lobes short to moderate in length, not distinctly longer than length of lobes......................................................... 12

12a (11b). Pygidium tapering apically an acute point.............................................. Acutaspis Ferris, 1941 View in CoL

12b. Pygidium tapering apically to a rounded or truncate apex......................... Lindingaspis MacGillivray, 1921 View in CoL

13a (10b). Pygidium with longest paraphyses arising from the lateral corner of base of lobes (usually with 2 paraphyses between L1 and L2 and between L2 and L3); dorsum of pygidium divided into sclerotized areas; large V-shaped reticulate sclerotized area on A6 always present.............................................. Crenulaspidiotus MacGillivray, 1921 View in CoL

13b. Pygidium with longest paraphyses in interlobular space(s); usually with 1 paraphysis between L1 and L2 and another between L2 and L3; dorsum of pygidium not divided into sclerotized areas and without a large V-shaped reticulate sclerotized area on A6.................................................................................. 14

14a (13b). Anterior margin of head of mature female distinctly sclerotized, differentiated from lateral margin, resembling a “cap”.............................................................................. Mycetaspis Cockerell, 1897 View in CoL

14b. Anterior margin of head of mature female not distinctly sclerotized or differentiated from lateral margin, not resembling a “cap”...................................................................... Melanaspis Cockerell, 1897 View in CoL

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Diaspididae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF