Cryptopone, , Emery, 1893
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3817.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A3C10B34-7698-4C4D-94E5-DCF70B475603 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5117602 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03775906-A6C7-2C9B-FF17-FBD912B8FD7F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cryptopone |
status |
|
Species of Cryptopone View in CoL View at ENA
As discussed by Bolton & Fisher (2011), C. hartwigi is the only species of Cryptopone found in tropical Africa. It possesses a basal mandibular pit and metatibial pusher setae, characteristics of Cryptopone , and fits the diagnosis for this genus as proposed in the present work. However, recently P.S. Ward (pers. comm.) examined a number of ponerine species using molecular methods and found that C. hartwigi is closely related to Fisheropone and only distantly related to C. gilva and C. testacea , suggesting that C. hartwigi is not a true Cryptopone and the observed similarity is due to convergence in the characters they apparently share. Unfortunately, it proved challenging to find morphological characters that would separate C. hartwigi from “true” Cryptopone . Without such characters it is impossible to determine if only C. hartwigi should be removed from Cryptopone , or if other species are also misplaced and in need of transfer to other genera (new or existing). Only a detailed study of the genus will determine the true relationships among these species. Until this can be completed we are taking a conservative approach and placing C. hartwigi within Cryptopone , acknowledging that this placement will likely need emendation as our understanding of the group improves.
C. arabica Collingwood & Agosti, 1996 : Yemen (comb. rev.)
C. butteli Forel, 1913 : Indonesia (Sumatra) (comb. rev.)
C. crassicornis (Emery, 1897) : New Guinea (comb. rev.)
C. fusciceps Emery, 1900 : New Guinea (comb. rev.)
C. gigas Wu & Wang, 1995 : China (comb. rev.)
C. gilva (Roger, 1863) : United States (comb. rev.)
C. guianensis ( Weber, 1939) : Guiana (comb. nov.)
C. hartwigi Arnold, 1948 View in CoL : South Africa (comb. rev.)
C. holmgreni (Wheeler, 1925) : Peru (comb. nov.)
C. jinxiuensis Zhou, 2001 : China (comb. rev.)
C. mirabilis ( Mackay & Mackay, 2010) : Bolivia (comb. nov.)
C. motschulskyi Donisthorpe, 1943 View in CoL : New Guinea (comb. rev.)
C. nicobarensis Forel, 1905 View in CoL : Nicobar Islands (comb. rev.)
C. ochracea (Mayr, 1855) View in CoL : Italy (comb. rev.)
C. ochracea sicula ( Emery, 1909) View in CoL : Italy (comb. rev.)
C. pseudogigas Zhou & Zheng, 1997 : China (comb. rev.)
C. recticlypea Xu, 1998 : China (comb. rev.)
C. rotundiceps (Emery, 1914) View in CoL : New Caledonia (comb. rev.)
C. sauteri (Wheeler, W.M., 1906) : Japan (comb. rev.)
C. sinensis Wang, 1992 : China (comb. rev.)
C. subterranea (Bharti & Wachkoo, 2013) : India (comb. rev.)
C. taivanae (Forel, 1913) : Taiwan (comb. rev.)
C. tengu Terayama, 1999 : Japan (comb. rev.)
C. testacea Emery, 1893 View in CoL : Sri Lanka (comb. rev.)
C. typhlos (Karavaiev, 1935) : Vietnam (comb. rev.)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Cryptopone
Schmidt, C. A. & Shattuck, S. O. 2014 |
C. jinxiuensis
Zhou 2001 |
C. tengu
Terayama 1999 |
C. recticlypea
Xu 1998 |
C. pseudogigas
Zhou & Zheng 1997 |
C. hartwigi
Arnold 1948 |
C. motschulskyi
Donisthorpe 1943 |
C. nicobarensis
Forel 1905 |
C. testacea
Emery 1893 |