Lanatomyia Debenham
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3879.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6423894B-97D9-4286-ABB9-D4AF072B57FD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5593047 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/027587C9-BD74-302D-FD72-1FD94941E471 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Lanatomyia Debenham |
status |
|
Lanatomyia Debenham View in CoL
( Figs. 21K View FIGURE 21 , 27F View FIGURE 27 , 30S View FIGURE 30 , 39E View FIGURE 39 , 45R–S View FIGURE 45 , 52D View FIGURE 52 , 67C View FIGURE 67 , 76J View FIGURE 76 )
DIAGNOSIS: Only pupa of Ceratopogonidae with the prothoracic extension wide medially and not extending to the antenna ( Fig. 27F View FIGURE 27 ), the dorsal apotome with only a ventral tubercle ( Fig. 21K View FIGURE 21 ), abdominal segment 4 with the L-1-IV anterior to remaining lateral sensilla but with all these situated at the segment's midlength ( Fig. 67C View FIGURE 67 ) and abdominal segment 8 with the two ventral sensilla (V-5-VIII and V-6-VIII) on separate tubercles.
DESCRIPTION: Total length = 4.78–5.19 mm. Without larval exuviae retained on abdomen. Exuviae with flagellum appressed against lateral margin of midleg, wing (as in Figs. 16B View FIGURE 16 , 33B View FIGURE 33 ). Ecdysial tear around base of antenna, along lateral margin of face to palpus (as in Figs. 17C View FIGURE 17 , 79H View FIGURE 79 ). Head: Dorsal apotome ( Fig. 21K View FIGURE 21 ), with ventral line of weakness, without dorsomedial tubercle, without central dome; dorsolateral cephalic sclerite (as in Fig. 13H View FIGURE 13 ) fused to scutum, each side separated medially by dorsal apotome in whole pupa; mouthparts ( Fig. 27F View FIGURE 27 ) with mandible well-developed, lacinia absent; palpus extending posterior to posterolateral margin of labium; labium separated medially by labrum, hypopharynx; apex of antenna ( Fig. 39E View FIGURE 39 ) anterior to just anterior to posterior extent of midlength portion of midleg (portion lateral to mesosternum), narrowed posteriorly; sensilla: dorsal apotomals ( Fig. 21K View FIGURE 21 )—1 elongate seta, 1 campaniform sensillum; dorsolateral cephalic sclerite sensilla—1 seta; clypeal-labrals ( Fig. 27F View FIGURE 27 )—2 slender setae; oculars ( Fig. 27F View FIGURE 27 )—2 setae, 1 campaniform sensillum. Thorax: Prothoracic extension ( Fig. 27F View FIGURE 27 ) wide, well-developed but narrow dorsolaterally, not extending to antenna; mesonotum with short tubercles, not extending posteromedially, not dividing metathorax medially ( Fig. 52D View FIGURE 52 ); respiratory organ ( Figs. 45R–S View FIGURE 45 ) length/width = 2.95–3.06, moderately elongate, somewhat flattened apically, with pores closely abutting at apex of respiratory organ, arranged in single curved row, outer surface with some wrinkles, without pedicel, base with elongate posteromedial apodeme, membranous base of respiratory organ short, tracheal tube straight to slightly curved along length, with spirals restricted to base, wrinkles to half length; wing ( Fig. 39E View FIGURE 39 ) without apical tubercle or angle, separated medially by fore-, midlegs; halter apex and hind leg (as in Fig. 33A View FIGURE 33 ) broadly abutting; halter apex abutting anterolateral knob-like extension of tergite 2; legs ( Fig. 39E View FIGURE 39 ) with lateral margin of foreleg near midlength of wing evenly curved; hind leg visible at lateral margin of wing (as in Fig. 33I View FIGURE 33 ); with apex of foreleg moderately anterior to apex of midleg; apex of hind leg abutting apex of midleg laterally; sensilla: anteromedials—2 elongate setae (as in Figs. 31L–M View FIGURE 31 ); anterolaterals—1 moderately long seta; dorsal setae ( Fig. 30S View FIGURE 30 )—D-1-T, D-2-T, D-4-T, D-5-T setae, D-3-T campaniform sensillum; D-1-T, D-2-T on single tubercle, D- 3-T anterolateral to D-4-T; supraalar 2—campaniform sensillum; metathoracics ( Fig. 52D View FIGURE 52 )—1 campaniform sensillum; M-3-T distant from margin of metathorax (at least 1/3 length of metathorax). Abdomen: with tergites 1- 7 with medial area with stripe, 2 anterolateral spots, sternites 3-7 with medial stripe, anterolateral spot, segment 2 as wide or slightly wider than segment 3, segments with undivided, thin to thick setae, with rounded to pointed, short tubercles, tergites or sternites entire, each without membranous disc; segment 9 ( Fig. 76J View FIGURE 76 ) not strongly modified, terminal processes closely approximated basally, each projecting posterodorsolaterally, tapering to pointed apex; sensilla: tergite 1 ( Fig. 52D View FIGURE 52 ) with 6 setae, 2 campaniform sensilla, including 2 lateral sensilla, D-2-I, D-3-I closely approximated, D-7-I situated anteriorly near D-3-I; segment 4 ( Fig. 67C View FIGURE 67 )—D-2-IV, D-3-IV short to moderately elongate setae on short tubercles; D-5-IV, D-8-IV, D-9-IV short to moderately elongate setae; D-5-IV on single tubercle, D-8-IV, D-9-IV on separate but closely approximated tubercles, posterior dorsal sensilla in transverse row, arranged medially to laterally: D-5-IV, D-4-IV, D-8-IV, D-9-IV; D-7-IV near D-3-IV; L-1-IV elongate seta on short tubercle, just anterior of L-2-IV, L-3-IV, L-4-IV on anterior half of segment; L-2-IV, L-3-IV, L-4-IV moderately elongate setae on pointed tubercles, V-5-IV, V-7-IV short setae, V-6-IV elongate seta, on short rounded tubercles, all closely approximated; segment 8 without D-3-VIII, without L-1-VIII; segment 9 ( Fig. 76J View FIGURE 76 )—with D-5-IX, D-6-IX campaniform sensilla.
DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT: The genus Lanatomyia is known from three species in the Oriental and Australasian Regions ( Borkent 2014 ). Immatures have been collected from sandy pool edges. Harris (1981) described pupal behaviour, with pupae keeping their abdomens in substrate until just prior to adult emergence.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION: Two species of Lanatomyia are known as pupae ( Tables 2–3 View TABLE 2 View TABLE 3 ). Debenham (1974) described the lateral sensilla of abdominal segment 6 of L. miles and these are considerably more scattered in an anterior to posterior arrangement than that reported here for segment 4 ( Fig. 67C View FIGURE 67 ) (based on original material). Elson-Harris (1987) described the abdominal segment 4 sensilla of L. miles and appears to show the lateral and posterior sensilla as relatively more posterior on the segment than shown here ( Fig. 67C View FIGURE 67 ). It appears that she did not draw part of the posterior portion of the segment (as she did do for L. electra ). Elson-Harris (1987) keyed the two Australian species.
MATERIAL EXAMINED: L. electra : 1 pupal exuviae, Yellow Water, Australia, 14-I-1956 (ANIC). L. miles : 1 pupal exuviae, Mountain Lake, Thurmere Lakes, New South Wales, Australia, 2-II-1966 (ANIC); 1 pupal exuviae, Nattai River, Mittagong, New South Wales, Australia, 5-II-1965 (ANIC).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |