Homohelea Kieffer

Borkent, Art, 2014, The Pupae of the Biting Midges of the World (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), With a Generic Key and Analysis of the Phylogenetic Relationships Between Genera, Zootaxa 3879 (1), pp. 1-327 : 95-96

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3879.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6423894B-97D9-4286-ABB9-D4AF072B57FD

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5593051

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/027587C9-BD70-3029-FD5B-18314C72E0F4

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Homohelea Kieffer
status

 

Homohelea Kieffer View in CoL

( Figs. 27H View FIGURE 27 , 31A View FIGURE 31 , 40A–B View FIGURE 40 , 46A–B View FIGURE 46 , 52F View FIGURE 52 , 68B View FIGURE 68 , 77A View FIGURE 77 )

DIAGNOSIS: Only pupa of Ceratopogonidae with the abdominal tubercles all apically rounded ( Fig. 68B View FIGURE 68 ), abdominal segment 4 with D-8-IV and D-9-IV on separate or, at most, only basally fused tubercles ( Fig. 68B View FIGURE 68 ) and abdominal segment 8 with the two ventral sensilla (V-5-VIII, V-6-VIII) on a single tubercle and V-5-VIII tiny and V-6-VIII elongate.

DESCRIPTION: Total length = 4.88 mm. Without larval exuviae retained on abdomen. Exuviae with flagellum appressed against lateral margin of midleg, wing (as in Figs. 16B View FIGURE 16 , 33B View FIGURE 33 ). Ecdysial tear around base of antenna, along lateral margin of face to palpus (as in Figs. 17C View FIGURE 17 , 79H View FIGURE 79 ). Head: Dorsal apotome as described by de Meillon & Wirth (1981), uncertain ventral line of weakness, without dorsomedial tubercle, without central dome; dorsolateral cephalic sclerite (as in Fig. 13H View FIGURE 13 ) fused to scutum, each side separated medially by dorsal apotome in whole pupa; mouthparts ( Fig. 27H View FIGURE 27 ) with mandible well-developed, lacinia absent; palpus extending equal to or just posterior to posterolateral margin of labium; labium separated medially by labrum, hypopharynx; apex of antenna ( Fig. 40A–B View FIGURE 40 ) anterior to posterior extent of midlength portion of midleg (portion lateral to mesosternum), narrowed posteriorly; sensilla: dorsal apotomals (as described by de Meillon & Wirth 1981)—1 elongate seta, 1 campaniform sensillum; dorsolateral cephalic sclerite sensilla—1 seta, campaniform sensillum not visible (dirty specimens); clypeal-labrals ( Fig. 27H View FIGURE 27 )—2 slender setae; oculars ( Fig. 27H View FIGURE 27 )—2 setae, 1 campaniform sensillum. Thorax: Prothoracic extension ( Fig. 27H View FIGURE 27 ) wide, well-developed but narrow dorsolaterally, not extending to antenna; mesonotum without tubercles, not extending posteromedially, not dividing metathorax medially ( Fig. 52F View FIGURE 52 ); respiratory organ ( Figs. 46A–B View FIGURE 46 ) length/width = 4.55–5.70, elongate, slender, somewhat flattened apically, with pores closely abutting at apex of respiratory organ, arranged in single row, outer surface smooth, with short, wide pedicel, base with elongate posteromedial apodeme, membranous base of respiratory organ short, annulated, tracheal tube straight to slightly curved along length, with spirals restricted to base, plates to half length; wing ( Fig. 40A–B View FIGURE 40 ) with short tubercle at apex of hind leg, separated medially by fore-, midlegs; halter apex and hind leg (similar to Fig. 33J View FIGURE 33 ) broadly abutting; halter apex extending posteriorly to 1/4 length of tergite 2; legs ( Fig. 40A–B View FIGURE 40 ) with lateral margin of foreleg near midlength of wing evenly curved; hind leg visible at lateral margin of wing (as in Fig. 33I View FIGURE 33 ); male with apex of foreleg moderately anterior to apex of midleg, female with apex of foreleg ventral to apex of midleg; apex of hind leg abutting apex of midleg laterally; sensilla: anteromedials—2 elongate setae (as in Figs. 31L–M View FIGURE 31 ); anterolaterals—1 moderate seta; dorsal setae ( Fig. 31A View FIGURE 31 )—D-1-T, D-2-T, D-4-T, D-5-T setae, D-3-T campaniform sensillum, D-3-T lateral to slightly posterolateral to D-4-T; supraalar 2—campaniform sensillum; metathoracics ( Fig. 52F View FIGURE 52 )—1 campaniform sensillum; M-3-T distant from margin of metathorax (at least 1/3 length of metathorax). Abdomen: with tergite 1 uncertain, tergites 2-7 with medial area with stripe, 2 anterolateral spots, sternites 3–7 with anterolateral spots hard to see, segment 2 as wide or slightly wider than segment 3, segments with undivided, thin to thick setae, with rounded, short tubercles, tergites or sternites entire, each without membranous disc; segment 9 ( Fig. 77A View FIGURE 77 ) not strongly modified, terminal processes closely approximated basally, each projecting posterodorsolaterally, tapering to pointed apex; sensilla: tergite 1 ( Fig. 52F View FIGURE 52 ) with 8 setae, 2 campaniform sensilla, including 3 lateral sensilla, D-2-I, D-3-I closely approximated, D-7-I situated anteriorly near D-3-I; segment 4 ( Fig. 68B View FIGURE 68 )—D-2-IV, D-3-IV moderately elongate setae, D-2-IV on short tubercle; D-5-IV, D-8- IV, D-9-IV moderately elongate setae; D-5-IV on single tubercle, D-8-IV, D-9-IV on basally fused, flattened but closely approximated tubercles, posterior dorsal sensilla in transverse row, arranged medially to laterally: D-5-IV, D-4-IV, D-8-IV, D-9-IV; D-7-IV near D-3-IV; L-1-IV moderately elongate seta arising from flat surface, moderately anterior of posterior lateral setae; L-2-IV, L-3-IV, L-4-IV short setae on rounded tubercles, those of L- 2-IV, L-4-IV flattened, V-5-IV, V-6-IV, V-7-IV short setae on rounded, flattened tubercles, all closely approximated; segment 8 without D-3-VIII, without L-1-VIII; with V-5-VIII, V-6-VIII on single tubercle, V-5-VIII tiny, V-6-VIII elongate; segment 9 ( Fig. 77A View FIGURE 77 )—with D-5-IX, D-6-IX campaniform sensilla.

DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT: The genus Homohelea is known from 19 species in the Palaearctic, Oriental, and Afrotropical Regions ( Borkent 2014 ). Pupae have been collected from a river margin, a brackish marsh, ponds, and ground pools. Ingram & Macfie (1921) noted pupae were common in "puddles of dirty water near a stand-pipe".

TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION: Three species of Homohelea are known as pupae ( Tables 2–3 View TABLE 2 View TABLE 3 ). The dorsal apotomes of the available specimens were absent and cannot, therefore, be characterized. The dorsal apotome of H. delanoe was described (but not illustrated) by de Meillon & Wirth (1981) as having "a pair of small tubercles each bearing a slender hair", which is the typical condition in most Ceratopogonidae .

In addition to the male specimens examined, photos were made available (Burgert Muller, NMSA) of the holotype female of H. albitudinis and a non-type female specimen of H. delanoe , allowing comparisons to be made of sexually dimorphic features with the male pupae at hand (see character 44).

MATERIAL EXAMINED: H. delanoe : 2 pupal exuviae, Zoutpan, Transvaal, South Africa, 10-I-1974 (USNM).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Ceratopogonidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF