Xenohelea Kieffer

Borkent, Art, 2014, The Pupae of the Biting Midges of the World (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), With a Generic Key and Analysis of the Phylogenetic Relationships Between Genera, Zootaxa 3879 (1), pp. 1-327 : 99-100

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3879.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6423894B-97D9-4286-ABB9-D4AF072B57FD

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5593059

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/027587C9-BD4C-3015-FD51-1B5F4C46E039

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Xenohelea Kieffer
status

 

Xenohelea Kieffer View in CoL

( Figs. 28C View FIGURE 28 , 31D View FIGURE 31 , 40F View FIGURE 40 , 46F View FIGURE 46 , 53C View FIGURE 53 , 69B View FIGURE 69 , 77D View FIGURE 77 )

DIAGNOSIS: Only pupa of Ceratopogonidae with abdominal tergite sensilla D-8-IV and D-9-IV on the apex of a single lobed, flattened tubercle ( Fig. 69B View FIGURE 69 ).

DESCRIPTION: Total length = 5.59 mm. Without larval exuviae retained on abdomen. Exuviae with flagellum appressed against lateral margin of midleg, wing (as in Figs. 16B View FIGURE 16 , 33B View FIGURE 33 ). Ecdysial tear around base of antenna, along lateral margin of face to palpus (as in Figs. 17C View FIGURE 17 , 79H View FIGURE 79 ). Head: Dorsal apotome missing; dorsolateral cephalic sclerite (as in Fig. 13H View FIGURE 13 ) fused to scutum, each side separated medially by dorsal apotome in whole pupa; mouthparts ( Fig. 28C View FIGURE 28 ) with mandible well-developed, lacinia absent; palpus extending just posterior to posterolateral margin of labium; labium entire (not divided medially); apex of antenna ( Fig. 40F View FIGURE 40 ) anterior to posterior extent of midlength portion of midleg (portion lateral to mesosternum), narrowed posteriorly; sensilla: dorsal apotomals—uncertain; dorsolateral cephalic sclerite sensilla—1 seta, 1 campaniform sensillum; clypeallabrals ( Fig. 28C View FIGURE 28 )—2 slender setae; oculars ( Fig. 28C View FIGURE 28 )—2 setae, 1 campaniform sensillum. Thorax: Prothoracic extension ( Fig. 28C View FIGURE 28 ) wide, well-developed but narrow dorsolaterally, not extending to antenna; mesonotum without tubercles, not extending posteromedially, not dividing metathorax medially ( Fig. 53C View FIGURE 53 ); respiratory organ ( Fig. 46F View FIGURE 46 ) length/width = 4.83, elongate, moderately slender, somewhat flattened apically, with pores closely abutting at apex of respiratory organ, arranged in single curved row, outer surface with some wrinkles, with short, wide pedicel, base with moderate elongate posteromedial apodeme, membranous base of respiratory organ short, tracheal tube straight to slightly curved along length, with spirals restricted to base, wrinkles to half length; wing ( Fig. 40F View FIGURE 40 ) without apical tubercle or angle, separated medially by fore-, midlegs; halter apex and hind leg (similar to Fig. 33J View FIGURE 33 ) broadly abutting; halter apex extending posteriorly to 1/4 length of tergite 2; legs ( Fig. 40F View FIGURE 40 ) with lateral margin of foreleg near midlength of wing evenly curved; hind leg visible at lateral margin of wing (as in Fig. 33I View FIGURE 33 ); female with apex of foreleg ventral to apex of midleg; apex of hind leg abutting apex of midleg laterally; sensilla: anteromedials—2 elongate setae (as in Figs. 31L–M View FIGURE 31 ); anterolaterals—1 moderately long seta; dorsal setae ( Fig. 31D View FIGURE 31 )—D-1-T, D-2-T, D-4-T, D-5-T setae, D-3-T campaniform sensillum, D-4-T uncertain, broken along length, D-3-T lateral to D-4-T; supraalar 2—campaniform sensillum; metathoracics ( Fig. 53C View FIGURE 53 )—1 campaniform sensillum; M-3-T distant from margin of metathorax (at least 1/3 length of metathorax). Abdomen: with tergites 1–7 with medial area with stripe, 2 spots, sternites 3–7 with medial stripe, anterolateral spot, segment 2 as wide or slightly wider than segment 3, segments with undivided, thin to thick setae, with rounded to pointed, short to moderately elongate tubercles, tergites or sternites entire, each without membranous disc; segment 9 ( Fig. 77D View FIGURE 77 ) not strongly modified, terminal processes closely approximated basally, each projecting posterodorsolaterally, tapering to pointed apex; sensilla: tergite 1 ( Fig. 53C View FIGURE 53 ) with 7 setae, 3 campaniform sensilla (1 broken seta?), including 3 lateral sensilla, D-2-I, D-3-I closely approximated, D-7-I situated anteriorly near D-3-I; segment 4 ( Fig. 69B View FIGURE 69 )—D- 2-IV, D-3-IV moderately elongate setae, D-2-IV on short tubercle; D-5-IV, D-8-IV, D-9-IV short to moderately elongate setae; D-5-IV on single tubercle, D-8-IV, D-9-IV on single flattened tubercle, posterior dorsal sensilla in transverse row, arranged medially to laterally: D-5-IV, D-4-IV, D-8-IV, D-9-IV; D-7-IV near D-3-IV; L-1-IV short seta on short tubercle, just anterior of base of tubercle with L-2-IV, L-3-IV; L-2-IV, L-3-IV, L-4-IV short setae on rounded, flattened tubercles, L-2-IV, L-3-IV on single tubercle, V-5-IV, V-6-IV, V-7-IV short setae on short tubercles, all closely approximated; segment 8 without D-3-VIII, without L-1-VIII; with V-5-VIII, V-6-VIII on single tubercle, V-5-VIII tiny, V-6-VIII elongate; segment 9 ( Fig. 77D View FIGURE 77 )—with D-5-IX campaniform sensillum, D- 6-IX possibly absent (not discernable).

DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT: The genus Xenohelea is known from 14 species in the Afrotropical and Oriental Regions ( Borkent 2014). The only known pupa was collected in mud from "aus einem klaren Gewässer" (a clear body of water) ( Mayer 1957).

TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION: Only one species of Xenohelea is known as a pupa ( Tables 2–3 View TABLE 2 View TABLE 3 ). Male and female pupae of Homohelea and Sphaeromias , two genera closely related to Xenohelea , are sexually dimorphic in the arrangement of their forelegs. In males, the foreleg is relatively short ( Figs. 40A, D View FIGURE 40 ) while in females the foreleg overlaps the midleg entirely ( Figs. 40B, E View FIGURE 40 ). Only one female Xenohelea is known ( Fig. 40F View FIGURE 40 ) and it is likely that the male, once discovered, will share this dimorphism (see character 44).

Mayer (1957) described the same specimen as I studied here, the only one known for the genus. He shows D- 8-IV and D-9-IV on separate, abutting tubercles but they are clearly located together on a single rounded tubercle. In addition, he showed V-5-IV and V-6-IV on a single tubercle, which was indeed present on one side but slightly separated on the other (that drawn here). The dorsal apotome of the single available specimen was missing and cannot, therefore, be characterized.

The female holotype was remounted in Canada Balsam from drying and damaged Hoyer's, perhaps accounting for some slight differences between the description here and that by Mayer (1957) (e.g. body length).

MATERIAL EXAMINED: X. galatea : 1 pupal exuviae (of holotype), Nametil Quelimane, Mozambique, 7-I- 1940 (SAIM).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Ceratopogonidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF