Megachile laticeps Smith
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5160372 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5164364 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/026F1569-FFD2-FFF4-398A-9638FE49FE76 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Megachile laticeps Smith |
status |
|
2. Megachile laticeps Smith View in CoL ,
Cat. Hymenopt. British Mus. 1: 183, 1853.
Ritidian Pt., April 16, Bryan ; Agana, Aug. 13, Rowley ; Barrigada, June, Swezey ; Piti , May 12 , July 7 , 24 , Sept. 16-20, Swezey, from trellised flowers of Antigonon leptopus , numerous males and females .
The female is M. nietallescens Cockerell, which has been said to be identical with M. robbii Ashmead, though I did not think so when revising the Philippine Megachile . I now think that M. mcgregori Cockerell, based on the male, cannot be separated from M. laticeps . In the Philippine Journal of Science (16: 147, 1920), I wrote of M. 11icgregori: "This may be the male of Megachile 1netallescens , which occurs in the same two localities. The abdomen is not at all metallic; but otherwise, aside from the usual sexual differences, the insects are very much alike." This species has undoubtedly been introduced into Guam from the Philippine Islands.
"This bee is widely distributed in Guam, but most of the specimens were collected at Piti. Evidence of its leafcutting activities was conspicuous throughout the island. Young kapok trees were often nearly completely defoliated by this bee, which cuts the circular and oblong bits of the leaves for the lining of nests. Rose bushes, too, were often nearly defoliated similarly."-O. H. Swezey.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Megachile laticeps Smith
CockerellL, T. D. A. 1942 |
Smith 1853: 183 |