Ameroseius sculptilis Berlese, 1916: 47
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.47121/acarolstud.1123419 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0224963B-FFE4-FFDD-D612-08D3FEBD0BDD |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Ameroseius sculptilis Berlese, 1916: 47 |
status |
|
Ameroseius sculptilis Berlese, 1916: 47 View in CoL .
Ameroseius sculptilis View in CoL — Khalili-Moghadam and Saboori, 2021: 412 View Cited Treatment .
Ameroseius (Ameroseius) sculptilis View in CoL — Hajizadeh et al., 2013: 150.
More information about the synonyms of this species are available in Mašán (2017: 51).
Specimens examined. Three females; Gölbaşı, Adıyaman, Turkey; 29 May 2014; coll. I. Döker and C. Kazak; unknown plant belongs to family Asteraceae . One female; Kuluşağı, Malatya, Turkey; 30 May 2014; coll. I. Döker and C. Kazak; Anchusa sp. ( Boraginaceae ).
Remarks. Ameroseius sculptilis was described from Italy ( Berlese, 1916) where it was found in moss. The description of this species is brief and both the description and illustrations lack many important details. Bregetova (1977) considered that Ameroseius pulcher Westerboer (in Westerboer and Bernhard, 1963) is a junior synonym of A. sculptilis . However, Bregetova (1977) did not provide any explanation for this decision, nor did she provide the details of the examined specimens. Ameroseius pulcher was described from Germany ( Westerboer and Bernhard, 1963) where it was found in rotting grass. Recently, Mašán (2017) has confirmed this synonymy by examination of type series of both species, we here follow Mašán (2017). Ameroseius sculptilis has also been recorded from Bulgaria, Iran, Japan, Norway, Russia, Slovakia ( Khalili-Moghadam and Saboori, 2021) and it is now recorded in Turkey for the first time, from soil-litter. Morphological characters of our specimens agree very well with the supplementary information presented by Mašán (2017) for this species. Ameroseius sculptilis is easily recognized by the dorsal shield strongly reticulated, between j6 and J2 with subtriangular sculptural pattern ( Fig. 2A View Figure 2 ), and with 29 pairs of mostly serrated setae, seta j1 thickened ( Fig. 2C View Figure 2 ), most j–J setae not reaching the base of the subsequent seta in the series ( Fig. 2A View Figure 2 ), sternal shield almost smooth (or faintly reticulated), except some irregular longitudinal lines laterally ( Figs 2B, 2D View Figure 2 ), bearing two pairs of smooth setae, setae st3 located on two small plates adjacent to posterior margin of sternal shield and st4 on soft cuticle near hyaline flap of genital shield ( Figs 2B, 2D View Figure 2 ); genital shield reticulate, with nearly parallel margins ( Figs 2B, 2D View Figure 2 ), anal shield subpentagonal, coarsely reticulate on surface, bearing only three circum-anal setae ( Figs 2B, 2E View Figure 2 ); six pairs of opisthogastric setae present ( Fig. 2B View Figure 2 ), metapodal platelets enlarged and rounded ( Fig. 2B View Figure 2 ); fixed cheliceral digit with an apical tooth and three robust teeth and movable digit with one small subapical tooth ( Fig. 2F View Figure 2 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ameroseius sculptilis Berlese, 1916: 47
łoharchi, Omid, Döker, İsmail, Yalçın, Kemal & Kazak, Cengiz 2022 |
Ameroseius (Ameroseius) sculptilis
Hajizadeh, J. & Ramrody, S. & Masan, P. 2013: 150 |
Ameroseius sculptilis
Berlese, A. 1916: 47 |