Ameroseius lidiae Bregetova, 1977: 161
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.47121/acarolstud.1123419 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0224963B-FFE4-FFD8-D520-08A9FC00085A |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Ameroseius lidiae Bregetova, 1977: 161 |
status |
|
Ameroseius lidiae Bregetova, 1977: 161 View in CoL .
Ameroseius lidiae View in CoL — Kazemi and Rajaei, 2013: 65; Khalili-Moghadam and Saboori, 2014: 675; Khalili-Moghadam and Saboori, 2021: 410 View Cited Treatment .
Ameroseius (Ameroseius) lidiae View in CoL — Hajizadeh et al., 2013: 150.
More information about the synonyms of this species are available in Mašán (2017: 51).
Specimens examined. Two females; 36°20'01.9"N, 34°00'03.3"E, Sökün , Silifke, Mersin, Turkey; 20 January 2015; coll. K. YalÇın; soil- litter in commercial strawberry field GoogleMaps . One female; 37°18'33"N, 34°45'48"E, AkÇatekir , Pozantı, Adana, Turkey; 3 February 2015; coll. I. Doker; moss in Pinus sp. Forest GoogleMaps . One female; 36°19'29.4"N, 34°03'16.0"E, Arkum , Silifke, Mersin, Turkey; 23 February 2015; coll. K. YalÇın; soil- litter in commercial strawberry field GoogleMaps .
Remarks. Ameroseius lidiae was described from Ukraine and Tajikistan (holotype: Ukraine, estuary of Dnieper River; paratype: Tajikistan hollow of willow tree) (see Bregetova, 1977). The description provided by Bregetova (1977) lack some of the most important details and do not provide enough information for accurate and consistent species identification. Recently, the species fully redescribed by Khalili-Moghadam and Saboori (2014). The species has also been recorded from China, Hungary, Iran, Kazakhstan, Moldavia, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Slovakia, Spain, Syria, Uzbekistan ( Khalili-Moghadam and Saboori, 2021) and it is now recorded in Turkey for the first time, from soil-litter. Morphological characters of our specimens agree very well with the redescription given by Khalili-Moghadam and Saboori (2014), also with supplementary information presented by Mašán (2017). Ameroseius lidiae is easily recognized by the dorsal shield entirely reticulated and with 29 pairs of somewhat slen- der setae ( Fig. 1A View Figure 1 ), seta j1 is about two times as wide as j2 ( Figs 1A, 1C View Figure 1 ), the tip of setae j6 and J2 extended at most to the midpoint of the distance between the base of j6-J2 and J2-J4, respectively, and J4 obviously not reaching posteri- or margin of dorsal shield ( Fig. 1A View Figure 1 ); sternal shield almost smooth (or faintly reticulated), except some irregular lines anteriorly ( Figs 1B, 1D View Figure 1 ), bearing two pairs of smooth setae, setae st3 located on two small plates adjacent to posterior margin of sternal shield and st4 on soft cuticle near hyaline flap of genital shield ( Figs 1B, 1D View Figure 1 ); genital shield reticulate, with nearly parallel margins ( Figs 1B, 1D View Figure 1 ), anal shield suboval, with delicate reticulation on surface and bearing only three circum-anal setae ( Figs 1B, 1E View Figure 1 ); six pairs of opisthogastric setae present ( Figs 1B, 1E View Figure 1 ), metapodal platelets small, elongate and narrow ( Fig. 1B View Figure 1 ); deutosternal groove with seven rows of 1– 2 denticles, the denticles of 5 th and 6 th rows not discernible ( Fig. 1F View Figure 1 ); cheliceral digits terminally with no hyaline appendages, fixed cheliceral digit with an apical tooth and three robust teeth and movable digit with one small subapical tooth ( Fig. 1G View Figure 1 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ameroseius lidiae Bregetova, 1977: 161
łoharchi, Omid, Döker, İsmail, Yalçın, Kemal & Kazak, Cengiz 2022 |
Ameroseius lidiae
Khalili-Moghadam, A. & Saboori, A. 2021: 410 |
Khalili-Moghadam, A. & Saboori, A. 2014: 675 |
Kazemi, Sh. & Rajaei, A. 2013: 65 |
Ameroseius (Ameroseius) lidiae
Hajizadeh, J. & Ramrody, S. & Masan, P. 2013: 150 |