Eremophlepsius sexnotatus Kusnezov, 1929
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5270.3.8 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F05A4310-0B0B-46A5-8EC0-72FEC9F52410 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7863585 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/021487A0-D458-7539-4FAC-DCC4FD5AFA54 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eremophlepsius sexnotatus Kusnezov, 1929 |
status |
|
Eremophlepsius sexnotatus Kusnezov, 1929 View in CoL
( Figs. 4–7 View FIGURES 1–17 , 23–34, 37–39 View FIGURES 18–39 , 41–44 View FIGURES 41–55 )
E. parvulus Dlabola, 1961 View in CoL , syn. n.
Material examined. Several series of specimens from southern Turkmenistan and southeastern Kazakhstan were studied.
Description. Pale yellowish with whitish forewings. Head with four black spots on fore margin, two spots in middle of crown on both sides of midline and two spots on hind margin. Pro- and mesonotum with numerous small dark spots of variable shape and size. Forewings with brown veins, darkened apices and fine line or speckled pattern in some cells; transverse veins on anterior margins broadly bordered with brown ( Figs. 4–7 View FIGURES 1–17 ).
Ovipositor sometimes extends beyond forewings ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–17 ).
In aedeagus shape, similar to E. rohdendorfi but differs by stem apices with wider teeth and rounded outer margins and by basal hook-like processes with shorter tips ( Figs. 23–26, 28–31 View FIGURES 18–39 ). Basal processes can be situated close to penis stems ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 18–39 ) or more dorsally ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 18–39 ); due to this, lateral view of penis varies greatly ( Figs. 23– 26 View FIGURES 18–39 ). Subgenital plates distinctly longer and styles narrower than in E. rohdendorfi ( Figs. 37–38 View FIGURES 18–39 ). Pygofer lobes are elongated at ends into narrow lobes, with ventral processes pointed and strongly bent dorsally ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 18–39 ). In Dubovsky (1966), drawings of the aedeagus somewhat differ from our photographs ( Figs. 27, 32 View FIGURES 18–39 ), whereas drawings of the style and pygofer lobe exactly match our specimens.
Body length:♁, 3.8–4.1 mm; ♀ (to the ends of forewings or ovipositor if extends beyond forewings), 4.4–4.7 mm.
Male calling signal. Signals of one male from southeastern Kazakhstan ( Urzharsky Region , 27 km south of Taskesken, Artemisia sp. and other herbs in the steppe on the riverbank, 24. VI. 2022, recording at 32 oC) were investigated ( Fig. 40 View FIGURE 40 ) .
Calling signal is a phrase lasting from 6–7 up to 10–12 s in our recordings and consisting of uniform syllables ( Figs. 41–44 View FIGURES 41–55 ). Syllable repetition period averages 0.95– 1.28 s. Syllable duration averages 0.27– 0.46 s. Each syllable consists of partially merged pulses more distinct in its initial part ( Figs. 43–44 View FIGURES 41–55 ); in the end part of a phrase, pulses in syllables sometimes are almost indistinct.
Distribution. Steppes and semideserts of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Tadzhikistan. Despite its wide distribution, E. parvulus is a rare and sporadically occurring species.
Remarks. The description of appearance and coloration of E. parvulus Dlabola, 1961 corresponds exactly to E. sexnotatus . The aedeagus of E. parvulus in dorsal view also almost does not differ from the aedeagus of E. sexnotatus (cf. Figs. 28–31 and 34 View FIGURES 18–39 ). For this reason, we consider E. parvulus a junior synonym of E. sexnotatus . The drawing of the aedeagus in lateral view in Dlabola (1961) ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 18–39 ) is similar to that of Dubovsky (1966) ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 18–39 ) and was probably taken from the same angle.
Listed as Phlepsius sexnotatus in Metcalf (1967) and McKamey (2000), but as Eremophlepsius sexnotatus in Dubovsky (1966), Nast (1972), and Zahniser (2007 –present).
Genus Pseudo p hlepsius Zachvatkin, 1924
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Eremophlepsius sexnotatus Kusnezov, 1929
Tishechkin, Dmitri Yu. 2023 |
E. parvulus
Dlabola 1961 |