Lasioglossum
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.4.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AC09A256-A83D-46B7-A71D-E84B5ABFD138 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6108247 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0204411B-FFDD-C855-41C5-FB72FA06FB34 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lasioglossum |
status |
|
Key to the species of the Lasioglossum View in CoL series in South Korea
Females
1. Mesoscutum with anterior edge reflexed upward, medio-anterior region with punctures forming a dense transverse ridge (Fig.
2A); T1 basally with dense, thick tomentum (Fig. 2B).................... Lasioglossum subopacum subopacum (Smith) - Mesoscutum flat and punctate on medio-anterior margin (Fig. 2C); T1 without tomentum (Fig. 2D).................... 2 2. Metapostnotum and posterior surface of propodeum demarcated by transverse carina on posterior margin of metapostnotum
(sometimes weakly so) (Fig. 2E)......................................................................... 3 - Metapostnotum and posterior surface of propodeum demarcated by distinct oblique carina on posterior surface (Figs. 2F, 4D)
or not distinctly demarcated by carina ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4. A, B, E, F C).............................................................. 7 3. Metapostnotum of propodeum dull, with distinct tessellation among ridges ( Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3. A, B ).............. … L. exiliceps (Vachal) - Metapostnotum of propodeum shiny, nearly smooth among ridges ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3. A, B )....................................... 4 4. Posterior surface of propodeum with complete carina extending dorsally to transverse carina ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3. A, B C)...................
.................................................................................. L. proximatum (Smith) - Posterior surface of propodeum with incomplete carina not extending to transverse carina ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3. A, B D).................... 5 5. Supraclypeus shiny, with very weak tessellation ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3. A, B E); T1 medially with sparser PP (IS = 7 d in maximimu; Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4. A, B, E, F )....
......................................................................... L. primavera Sakagami & Maeta - Supraclypeus dull, with distinct tessellation ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3. A, B F); T1 medially with denser PP (IS = 1.5 d in maximum; Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4. A, B, E, F )........
................................................................................. L. sutshanicum Pesenko 6. Propodeum with ratio between width of apex of oblique ridges (bidirectional arrows in Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4. A, B, E, F C) and maximum width of poste-
rior surface 0.38–0.68 (n = 13)........................................................................... 7 - Propodeum with ratio between width of apex of oblique ridges (bidirectional arrows in Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4. A, B, E, F D) and maximum width of poste-
rior surface 0.05–0.2 (n = 14)............................................................................ 9 7. PP on T1 basally and medially with dense PP (IS = 1–1.5 d; Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4. A, B, E, F E).......................... L. upinense (Morawitz) - PP on T1 medially sparser than that on both basally and apically (IS =>1.5 d in maximum; Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4. A, B, E, F F).................... 8 8. Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum mixed with dark hairs; PP on lower declivitous surface of T1 sparser than below species (IS =
4.5 d in maximum; Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5. A, B )…............................................ L. nipponicola Sakagami & Tadauchi - Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum with pale yellowish brown hairs over entire surface, not mixed with dark ones; PP on lower
declivitous surface of T1 denser than above species (IS = 2 d in maxmimu; Fig. 5B View FIGURE 5. A, B )............. L. kansuense (Blüthgen) 9. Mesoscutum medially to posteriorly with sparser PP (IS = 3 d in maximum; Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5. A, B C)............ L. denticolle (Morawitz) - Mesoscutum medially to posteriorly with denser PP (IS = 1 d in maximum; Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5. A, B D)............................... 10 10. Integument of mesoscutum with distinct tessellation; lateral and posterior surfaces of propodeum with dense tomentose hairs.
............................................................................. L. circularum Fan & Ebmer - Integument of mesoscutum nearly smooth; lateral and posterior surfaces of propodeum with sparse tomentose hairs....... 11 11. Lateral and oblique carinae of posterior surface of propodeum strongly developed ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6. A, B ); submedial patch of T1 with
sparser PP (IS = 3.5 d in maximum; Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6. A, B C)................................................. L. occidens (Smith) - Lateral and oblique carinae of posterior surface of propodeum more weakly developed ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6. A, B ); submedial patch of T1 with
denser PP (IS = 2 d in maximum; Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6. A, B D)................................................. L. formosae (Strand)
Males
The male of L. sutshanicum could not examine in the present study. Therefore, it is not include in the following key.
1. Mesoscutum reflexed upward on medio-anterior margin similar to Fig. 2A............ L. subopacum subopacum (Smith) View in CoL
- Mesoscutum flat on medio-anterior margin such as Fig. 2C.................................................... 2
2. Mesoscutum medially and posteriorly with sparser PP (IS = 3 d in maxmimum) such as Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5. A, B C... L. denticolle (Morawitz) View in CoL
- Mesoscutum medially and posteriorly with denser PP (IS = 1.5 d in maximum) such as Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5. A, B D........................ 3
3. S6 with a unique hair tuft ( Figs. 7–8 View FIGURE 7. A – D View FIGURE 8. A – D )...................................................................... 4
- S6 without hair tuft.................................................................................... 9
4. Hair tuft on S6 ∩ or Ω shaped ( Figs. 7A–C View FIGURE 7. A – D , 8B–C View FIGURE 8. A – D )........................................................... 5
- Hair tuft on S6 of different shape ( Figs. 7D View FIGURE 7. A – D , 8A, 8D View FIGURE 8. A – D ).......................................................... 7
5. Apical part of hair tuft on S6 longitudinally narrow ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7. A – D )............................ L. circularum Fan & Ebmer View in CoL
- Apical part of hair tuft on S6 thick ( Figs. 7B–C View FIGURE 7. A – D , 8B–C View FIGURE 8. A – D )....................................................... 6
6. Submedial patch of T1 with sparser PP in both sexes (IS = 3.5 d in maximum; white circle in Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6. A, B C)... L. occidens (Smith) View in CoL
- Submedial patch of T1 with denser PP in both sexes (IS = 2 d in maximum; white circle in Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6. A, B D)... L. formosae (Strand) View in CoL
7. Hair tuft on S6 boomerang-shaped ( Fig. 8D View FIGURE 8. A – D )............................................. L. upinense (Morawitz) View in CoL
- Hair tuft on S6 of different shape ( Figs. 7D View FIGURE 7. A – D , 8A View FIGURE 8. A – D )............................................................. 8
8. Apical part of hair tuft on S6 small and short ( Fig. 8A View FIGURE 8. A – D )......................... L. nipponicola Sakagami & Tadauchi View in CoL
- Apical part of hair tuft on S6 longitudinally elongate ( Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7. A – D ).............................. L. kansuense (Blüthgen) View in CoL
9. Head nearly as long as wide or slightly longer than wide (HL/HW ratio = 0.98–1.06, n = 10).......... L. exiliceps (Vachal) View in CoL
- Head broader than long (HL/HW ratio = 0.85–0.91, n = 10).................................................... 5
10. F2 approximately 2× F1; male genitalia with ventral retrorse lobe............................. L. proximatum (Smith) View in CoL
- F2 approximately 1.2× F1; male genitalia without ventral retrorse lobe................ L. primavera Sakagami & Maeta View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |