Plagiotrochus vilageliui, Pujade-Villar & Villemant & Andreï-Ruiz, 2000
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4524758 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/011087FE-2734-FFA0-ABF7-17693C40FD11 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Plagiotrochus vilageliui |
status |
sp. nov. |
Plagiotrochus vilageliui n. sp. Pujade-Villar (agamic form)
( Figs 2 View FIG ; 3 View FIG )
TYPE MATERIAL. — El Toscar. Tarragona, Spain, holotype agamic ♀, captured 3.IV.1988 ( UB). Paratypes, same data as holotype, 12 agamic ♀ ♀ (ref. C3-41).
Matadepera. Barcelona , Spain, ex. Q. coccifera , (6.IV.1987) 20.IV.1987: 1 agamic ♀ (ref. C4-18) ( UB) ; idem (11.IV.1987) 13.IV.1987: 1 agamic ♀ (ref. C4-24) ( UB) ; idem (2.IV.1987) 12.IV.1987, 1 agamic ♀ (ref. C4-21) ( UB) ; idem 19.IV.1987, captured, 1 agamic ♀ (ref. C4-25) ( UB) .
Ctra de Santa Fe del Montseny. Barcelona, Spain, captured 29.IV.1987, 1 agamic ♀ (ref. C10-58).
Corella. Navarra, Spain, ex. Q. ilex (X-1997) extr. 3.XI.97, 1 agamic ♀ (Iguiñiz leg.) (UB).
Vallée du Fango. Corsica, France, yellow pan trap (1-7.V.1993), 1 ♁ (ref. R1/DA/C, Andrei-Ruiz leg.) (MNHN).
ETYMOLOGY. — This name was chosen to honour the mother of my daughters, Roser Vilageliu i Grau.
DIMENSIONS. — Length 2.5- 3 mm.
COLORATION. — Body amber or reddish brown, but some zones of the thorax, mainly the basal part of mesopleura and propodeum, dark brown. Dorsoposterior part of metasoma with a more or less expand- ed black mark. Legs with the same coloration as the thorax. Antenna brown, except for the two first antennomeres which are light brown. Wings translucent, with brown veins.
DESCRIPTION
Head ( Fig. 2A View FIG )
With short, sparse and flat pubescence. In frontal view, 1.2 time wider than high. Ventral margin of clypeus slightly incised. Face with weak radiating carinae ( Fig. 2A View FIG ). Distance between compound eyes similar to their height. Distance between toruli and compound eyes 2.5 times distance between toruli. Genae with coriaceous sculpture. Frons weakly depressed, with a conspicuous median ridge ( Fig. 2A View FIG ) and 2.3 times wider than long in dorsal view. Vertex and occiput with coriaceous-alutaceous sculpture. In dorsal view, genae clearly expanded behind the eyes. Pol:ool:lol are 17:8:7; diameter of lateral ocellus: 5, smaller to lol distance.
Antenna ( Fig. 3A View FIG )
Fourteen antennomeres, pedicel twice as long as wide, first flagellomere 1 curved and more than three times longer than the width; the fourth segment as long as or longer than the third one, but conspicuously wider; length of the remaining segments gradually decreasing, the 13 th one at least 1.5 time longer than the width. Sensillae from second flagellomere very conspicuous.
Mesosoma ( Fig. 2 View FIG B-D)
Sparsely pubescent. In lateral view ( Fig. 2C View FIG ), relatively short and high, nearly 1.5 time as long as high; in the same view, the mesonotum is quite humped, forming a straight angle with the pronotum. Mesoscutum in dorsal view ( Fig. 2B View FIG ) clearly longer than wide and 1.4 time as long as the scutellum. Pronotum in lateral view ( Fig. 2C View FIG ) with a coriaceous-rugulose sculpture and with several longitudinal carinae. Scutum weakly sculptured, coriaceous-alutaceous and in lateral view with several carinae running perpendicularly over the pronotum margin ( Fig. 2B, C View FIG ). Notauli weakly marked, not reaching one-third of the length of the mesoscutum ( Fig. 2B, C View FIG ). Median mesoscutal impression missing ( Fig. 2B View FIG ). Scutellar sculpture similar to that of the mesoscutum, scutellum trapezoidal and margined in dorsal view ( Fig. 2B View FIG ), flat in lateral view ( Fig. 2C View FIG ). Scutellar foveae well set off, oval and smooth. Metanotal trough smooth and glabrous without carinae. Propodeum ( Fig. 2D View FIG ) with two curved submedial carinae and with an incomplete medi- an carina. Mesopleura almost wholly sculptured, with a small, smooth area in its basal part.
Wings ( Fig. 3B View FIG )
Forewing with radial cell open at the margin and four times longer than wide. R1 and Rs veins do not reach the margin of the wing; R1 weakly angled and 2r vein strongly angled. Areolet present.
Legs
Tarsal claws simple.
Metasoma
Oval, as long as high. Nearly bare. Third and following terga punctured laterally. Hypopygial spine short; in lateral view twice as long as the height; in ventral view 2.5 to 3 times as long as the breadth, with short and sparse pubescence.
Gall ( Fig. 3C View FIG )
Collected in the northeastern Iberian Peninsula on Quercus coccifera and in the North Iberian Peninsula on Q. ilex . Larval chambers isolated from each other, in twigs with a diameter of less than 0.5 cm. The galls are not visible externally, so they are easily overlooked. In Corsica, they are also present on Q. ilex because the Plagiotrochus vilageliui adults are found on both hosts ( Q. ilex and Q. coccifera ) and Q. coccifera is absent from Corsica.
REMARKS
The colour and the presence of a margined scutellum with trapezoidal form relate this new species to P. kiefferianus . However, morphological characters of P. kiefferianus Tavares, 1901 greatly differ according to the host-plant bearing the galls ( Quercus ilex or Q. coccifera ) (Pujade-Villar 1991). P. vilageliui n. sp. forms a completely different gall. Moreover it is easily distinguished by its antennal segments, which are longer (1.7 to 2 times longer than wide), the presence of a conspicuous frontal carina and the humped mesonotum, both absent in P. kiefferianus . Another agamic form, Plagiotrochus australis (Mayr, 1882) , also makes galls on Q. ilex , but its adults differ from P. vilageliui . P. vilageliui differs from P. australis in lacking percurrent notauli, lacking the median mesoscutal impression, having a quadrangular thorax and the sculpture as well as the relative length of the first antennomeres are different shape.
UB |
Laboratoire de Biostratigraphie |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.