taxonID	type	description	language	source
039A50090670FF84FF516A5DFE6FFBC6.taxon	description	at K (K 000685481, K 000685482 digital images!) and CAL (CAL 0000024881!, CAL 0000031637!) collected by Dalzell agree with the protologue based on the label details and morphology of the specimens. K 000685481 has an annotation “ Bombay Dalzell ” and Herb. Hookerianum stamp, and Dalzell’s own annotated label as “ Pimpinella adscendens ”. One of the two sheets at CAL (CAL 0000031637) bears an incomplete specimen that is fragmented into pieces without a single leaf while the second sheet CAL 0000024881 lacks fruiting and flowering branches along with leaves. K 000685482 was the collection gifted to Kew, by Mrs. Dalzell (1878) after the demise of N. A. Dalzell. It bears four plants and has a pasted label “ Pimpinella adscendens ” by Dalzell in pencil and an annotation by C. B. Clarke as the same. An additional determinant slip is attached to the sheet by M. G. Pimenov in 2015 (pers. comm., Laura Pearce, the curator-Botanist, Science Collections, Kew). All these sheets can be considered as part of the original material. Among these, K 000685482 perfectly matches with the protologue is designated here as the lectotype.	en	Keywords, Arn. (2024): Typification of five names in Pimpinella (Apiaceae). Rheedea 34 (1): 69-73, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2024.34.01.09, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2024.34.01.09
039A50090671FF84FF686900FAF4FC11.taxon	description	In an updated checklist of Chinese Umbelliferae, Pimenov (2017) cited “ Peninsular India. Mountains in the south of the Peninsula, 09.1836, Wight 1173, 1194, 1202 ” (Lectotype K! designated here; isolectotypes E! – barcode E 00174681, NY – barcode NY 00406195, P – barcode P 00834778) ”. Pimenov cited multiple specimens and designated a lectotype deposited at K without mentioning a specific catalogue number as type. However, in K, we found one sheet of Wight 1173, and also, we couldn’t trace the specimen with catalogue number 1202, and both are not part of the original material. Hence, the selected specimen was not appropriate and doesn’t match the protologue, making it ineligible for consideration as a valid typification. Wight’s collections are available at P, and some types are at NY, and E (Stafleu & Cowan, 1988). We traced three sheets (E 00174681, NY 00406195, and P 00834778 digital images!). All sheets bear the original Wight herbarium label (Herb. Wight Propr.) with catalogue number “ 1194 ”. The sheet P 00834778 bears two fruiting and flowering branches, and a fragment of the stem with two leaves, and NY 00406195 bears a flowering plant with fragmented leaves. The specimen at E (E 00174681) is designated here as the lectotype which bears distinct basal leaves, and fruiting and flowering branches that match perfectly with the protologue. (Art. 9.3, Turland et al., 2018).	en	Keywords, Arn. (2024): Typification of five names in Pimpinella (Apiaceae). Rheedea 34 (1): 69-73, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2024.34.01.09, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2024.34.01.09
039A50090672FF86FF516D8EFDE0FE8F.taxon	description	A collection at G (G 00661992 digital image!) appears to be collected by B. Heyne, but do not have information about the collector or locations. So, it may or may not be part of the original material. Five collections by B. Heyne (K 001111296 – 98, K 000685519 – 20 digital images!) could be traced at K. K 000685519 and K 001111298 are from Komari, Sri Lanka (as Zeylon). K 001111296 bears a field note in the left corner with a small description by Heyne. K 001111297 has a label by Wallich and should be noted that an additional label “ Heyne 566 ” is attached in the right corner. K 000685520 has a label “ Helosciadium heyneanum ” written by Candolle in pencil (handwriting is confirmed from Burdet, 1973) which is collected from Sri Lanka (as Zeylon) and matches perfectly with the protologue, is designated here as the lectotype.	en	Keywords, Arn. (2024): Typification of five names in Pimpinella (Apiaceae). Rheedea 34 (1): 69-73, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2024.34.01.09, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2024.34.01.09
039A50090673FF81FF6868A8FDB9FD45.taxon	description	The collection BM 000885400 has an annotation label “ 633. Differt ab H. Heyneano DC. Foliis inferioribus tri- foliolatis, foliolo medio cordato-, lateralibus semi-cordato- lauceatis, Omnibus argute rigide serratis longeque petiolulatis ” in Miquel’s handwriting and overlapped with the writing “ Mercara 633 ” by Hohenacker. An additional label is attached to the left upper corner, annotated as “ India Orientali, Canara Hohenacker ” by Hohenacker. The specimen BM 000885400 bears 2 twigs along with the basal leaves and the annotations by Hohenacker and Miquel match perfectly with the protologue, hence selected here as the lectotype (Art. 9.3 of ICN, Turland et al., 2018).	en	Keywords, Arn. (2024): Typification of five names in Pimpinella (Apiaceae). Rheedea 34 (1): 69-73, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2024.34.01.09, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2024.34.01.09
