identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
970C87A9FFC9FFA3FFCBFB6287E01DF1.text	970C87A9FFC9FFA3FFCBFB6287E01DF1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Dioscorea gibbiflora Hook. f., Fl. Brit.	<div><p>Dioscorea gibbiflora Hook.f.,Fl.Brit. India 6:294.1892. Lectotype (designated here): Penang, fl., s.d., Wallich 5105B (K [K000098243 digital image!]; isolecto K [K000098242,K000098244,K000098245,K000098247 digital images!]). Fig. 2</p><p>Notes: Hooker (1892) described D. gibbiflora based on a collection made by Wallich from Penang. Five Wallichian (5105B) specimens (K000098242, K000098243, K000098244, K000098245, K000098247) were traced at K. Except the specimen K000098247, all other specimens were annotated by Hooker as D. gibbiflora . Among them, K000098243 (http://specimens.kew.org/herbarium/ K000098243) is the most representative one and thus designated here as lectotype.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/970C87A9FFC9FFA3FFCBFB6287E01DF1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	R. S., Pagare;K. C., Kishor;Arisdason, W.	R. S., Pagare, K. C., Kishor, Arisdason, W. (2020): Typification of seven names in Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae) described by J. D. Hooker. Rheedea 30 (2): 312-316, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2020.30.02.09, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2020.30.02.09
970C87A9FFC9FFA3FFCBF93B85891C59.text	970C87A9FFC9FFA3FFCBF93B85891C59.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Dioscorea jacquemontii Hook. f., Fl. Brit.	<div><p>Dioscorea jacquemontii Hook.f., Fl. Brit. India 6: 290. 1892. Lectotype (designated here): INDIA, Between Poonah and Carli, fl., s.d., Jaquemont 568 (K [K000950634 digital image!]). Fig. 3</p><p>Notes: Hooker (1892) described D. jacquemontii based on the collections made by Jacquemont and Ritchie from Concan, between Poonah (Pune), Carli and Belgaum, respectively. Two sheets bearing the same field number, Ritchie 730 (K000950635, K000950636) were traced at K. The sheet bearing barcode K0009500635 is mounted with three female specimens, whereas, the sheet with barcode, K000950636, has one male and one female specimen. Furthermore, a sheet with two fertile specimens (Jacquemont 568), male (K000950634) and female (K000098193) collected by Jacquemont was traced at K. All the four sheets can be considered as syntypes according to Art. 9.6 of Shenzhen Code (Turland et al., 2018). Among them, Jacquemont 568 (K000950634, http:// specimens.kew.org/herbarium/K000950634), is the most complete representative and is designated here as the lectotype.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/970C87A9FFC9FFA3FFCBF93B85891C59	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	R. S., Pagare;K. C., Kishor;Arisdason, W.	R. S., Pagare, K. C., Kishor, Arisdason, W. (2020): Typification of seven names in Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae) described by J. D. Hooker. Rheedea 30 (2): 312-316, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2020.30.02.09, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2020.30.02.09
970C87A9FFCAFFA0FFCBFB4882291D81.text	970C87A9FFCAFFA0FFCBFB4882291D81.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Dioscorea laurifolia Hook. f., Fl. Brit.	<div><p>Dioscorea laurifolia Wall. ex Hook.f., Fl. Brit. India 6: 293.1892.</p><p>Lectotype (designated here): Penang, fl., s.d., G. Porter s.n. (BM [BM001049925 digital image!]; isolecto K [K001104831, K000098237, K000098238 digital images!], CAL [Acc. No. 477394!]). Fig. 4</p><p>Notes: Hooker (1892) validated D. laurifolia Wall. (Numer. List No. 5111, nom. nud.) and mentioned three collectors, viz. Porter, Maingay and Hullet in the protologue. Four sheets from Penang, Porter (Wall., Numer. List No. 5111) has been located, one at BM (BM001049925) and three at K (K001104831, K000098237, K000098238) and all can be regarded as syntypes (Art. 9.4, 9.6; Turland et al., 2018). Also, no collection under Maingay and Hullet is traceable in any of the herbaria. Furthermore, in synonymy, a collection from Penang by Porter is referred under D. glabra (Wall., Numer. List No. 5105B). Three sheets have been traced under the name at BM and K (BM001049881, K001104787, K001104788), but we could not recognize any elongated unilaterally panicled male spikes in the specimens which is one of the key characters of D. laurifolia . Hence, these are not considered under D. laurifolia here. Among the four recognized sheets, the specimen (BM001049925, https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/ collection-specimens/resource/05ff2255-c38a- 40c9-b657-4ccb55ab2feb/record/4544812) with Porter’s annotation best agrees with the protologue and is designated here as the lectotype and others consequently as isolectotypes.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/970C87A9FFCAFFA0FFCBFB4882291D81	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	R. S., Pagare;K. C., Kishor;Arisdason, W.	R. S., Pagare, K. C., Kishor, Arisdason, W. (2020): Typification of seven names in Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae) described by J. D. Hooker. Rheedea 30 (2): 312-316, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2020.30.02.09, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2020.30.02.09
970C87A9FFCAFFA1FD5BF92884141893.text	970C87A9FFCAFFA1FD5BF92884141893.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Dioscorea obcuneata Hook. f., Fl. Brit.	<div><p>Dioscorea obcuneata Hook.f., Fl. Brit. India 6: 293. 1892. Lectotype (designated here): CEYLON, s.l., fl., s.d., Macrae 111 (K [K000098236 digital image!]; isolecto BM [BM000958191 digital image!]). Fig. 5</p><p>Notes: Hooker (1892) described D. obcuneata based on collection made from Ceylon (now Sri Lanka), but did not provide any details on specimen. However, Hooker (1892) had mentioned in the protologue that “he had seen one specimen in Hookerian Herbarium collected from Ceylon and annotated by Sir W. Hooker but with no other locality or collector’s name”. But, this specimen is not traceable in any of the herbaria. However, other two specimens were traced, one each at K (K000098236) and BM (BM000958191) for the name D. obcuneata . The specimen housed at K (K00008236) was annotated by Hooker and according to the article 9.6, the above specimens can be considered as syntypes. Among them, though both have distinct inflorescences, Macrae 111 housed at K (K000098236, http://specimens. kew.org/herbarium/K000098236) is the most complete specimen that shows phyllotaxy clearly is designated here as the lectotype.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/970C87A9FFCAFFA1FD5BF92884141893	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	R. S., Pagare;K. C., Kishor;Arisdason, W.	R. S., Pagare, K. C., Kishor, Arisdason, W. (2020): Typification of seven names in Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae) described by J. D. Hooker. Rheedea 30 (2): 312-316, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2020.30.02.09, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2020.30.02.09
970C87A9FFCBFFA1FD5BFF27824A185E.text	970C87A9FFCBFFA1FD5BFF27824A185E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Dioscorea polyclades Hook. f., Fl. Brit.	<div><p>Dioscorea polyclades Hook.f., Fl. Brit. India 6: 294. 1892. Lectotype (designated here): SINGAPORE, fl., 1890, Ridley 1646 (BM [BM001051495 digital image!]). Fig. 6</p><p>Notes: Hooker (1892) described D. polyclades based on collection made by Ridley from Singapore. Hooker (1892) had also stated “The Singapore plant I think certainly Zollinger’s No. 283 from Java”. Eight specimens of Zollinger 283, two each at BM (BM001051499, BM001051500), G (G00191826, G00191835) and K (K000098332, K001144646) and one each at L (L 1465246) and P (P01751236) were traced. But Ridley 1646 at BM (BM001051495, https://data.nhm.ac.uk/object/ b56ec95e-6155-4b9a-a01e-89e3679b557f/ 1564358400000) is the sole collection which unequivocally agrees with the protologue is designated here as the lectotype .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/970C87A9FFCBFFA1FD5BFF27824A185E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	R. S., Pagare;K. C., Kishor;Arisdason, W.	R. S., Pagare, K. C., Kishor, Arisdason, W. (2020): Typification of seven names in Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae) described by J. D. Hooker. Rheedea 30 (2): 312-316, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2020.30.02.09, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2020.30.02.09
970C87A9FFCBFFA6FD5BFC6787DC18C9.text	970C87A9FFCBFFA6FD5BFC6787DC18C9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Dioscorea wightii Hook. f., Fl. Brit.	<div><p>Dioscorea wightii Hook.f., Fl. Brit. India 6: 291.</p><p>1892. Lectotype (designated here, if not holotype): Travancore, Courtallam, August 1835, Wight 2827 (K [K000098200 digital image!]; isolecto CAL [CAL0000024785!]). Fig. 7</p><p>Notes: Hooker (1892) described D. wightii based on collection made by Robert Wight from Courtallam, (in Tamil Nadu). Two collections (male specimens), Wight 2827 and Wight 939A, which are matching with the protologue were traced at K. Under the gathering Wight 2827, two herbarium sheets were traced, one each at K (K000098200) and CAL (CAL0000024785), however, only the K specimen was annotated by the author. The herbarium catalogue database of Royal Botanical Garden, Edinburgh indicates Wight 939A (E00179442 and E00179443) as isotypes . There is no evidence to prove which among the available specimens is seen by Hooker. Since the primary deposit of Hooker is at Kew, the specimen bearing the barcode K000098200 (http:// specimens.kew.org/herbarium/K000098200) is selected here as the lectotype.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/970C87A9FFCBFFA6FD5BFC6787DC18C9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	R. S., Pagare;K. C., Kishor;Arisdason, W.	R. S., Pagare, K. C., Kishor, Arisdason, W. (2020): Typification of seven names in Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae) described by J. D. Hooker. Rheedea 30 (2): 312-316, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2020.30.02.09, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2020.30.02.09
