Amblyseius largoensis (Muma)
Amblyseiopsis largoensis Muma, 1955: 266 .
Amblyseius largoensis .— Muma et al., 1970: 69; Schicha, 1981b: 105; McMurtry & Moraes, 1984: 29; Moraes et al., 1986: 17; 2000: 239; 2004a: 143; 2004b: 33; Denmark & Muma, 1989: 55; Chant & McMurtry, 2004a: 208; 2007: 78; Zannou et al., 2007: 16.
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) largoensis .— Ehara & Bhandhufalck, 1977: 67; Denmark & Evans, 2011: 69.
Amblyseius amtalaensis Gupta, 1977: 53 (synonymy according to Gupta, 1986: 51).
Amblyseius magnolia e Muma, 1961: 289 (synonymy according to Denmark & Evans, 2011: 69).
Amblyseius sakalava Blommers, 1976: 96 (synonymy according to Ueckermann & Loots, 1988: 70).
Specimens examined. One female, on Durio zibethinus, at Chanthaburi Province, March 1993; and one female on Plumeria sp., at Rayong Province, August 1997.
Female
Dorsal shield 330–365 long and 180–225 wide; j1 33–34, j3 40–48, j4 5–7, j5 4–5, j6 7, J2 8, J5 7–9, z2 11, z 4 9–10, z5 5, Z 1 10–11, Z4 89–93, Z5 266–272, s4 89 –95, S 2 11 –14, S4 11, S 5 8 –10, r 3 11–12, R 1 10–17; distances between St1-St3 60, St2-St2 71, St5-St5 68; ventrianal shield 105–113 long, 46–48 wide at level of ZV2, 68–69 at anus level; calyx of spermatheca 23 long; fixed cheliceral digit 26–27 long, movable cheliceral digit 33 long; Sge I 41–42, Sge II 35–37, Sge III 42–47, Sti III 39–41, Sge IV 120–121, Sti IV 78–86, St IV 59–65. Chaetotaxy: genu II 2, 2/0-2/0, 1; genu III 1, 2/1-2/0, 1.
Previous records. Cosmopolitan, including Thailand (Provinces of Bangkok, Chiang Mai, Nakhon Pathom and Nakhon Ratchasima, Ehara & Bhandhufalck, 1977).
Remarks. Measurements of the specimens examined are similar to those reported by Denmark & Muma (1989) for a specimen of unspecified origin. However, our specimens differ by having longer Z5 (266–272 instead of 206) and cervix of spermatheca (23 instead of 18). Moraes et al. (2000) had also observed such differences for specimens from the Caribbean. Our measurements agree with those reported by Moraes et al. (2000) and Schicha (1981b) for specimens from the South Pacific, Moraes et al. (2004a) for specimens from Sri Lanka and Zannou et al. (2007) for specimens from sub-Saharan Africa.